Do you have the slides?
I don't have the full slides. The image was passed to me by a co-worker in
China. We are evaluating it.
I am copying the numbers below:
Release 3 YCSB clients (puts/seconds) 5 YCSB clients
0.94.14 178K 220K
0.96.0 20K 15K
0.96.1 173K 168K
Release 10 YCSB clients (reads/seconds) 25 YCSB clients
0.94.14 50K 52K
0.96.0 23K 23K
0.96.1 52K 54K
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where did you obtain the picture ?
> If you got it from slides posted on China Hadoop Summit website, can you
> share the link ?
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The picture didn't go through.
> > Correction: the comparison between hbase 0.96.0 and 0.96.1 was done by
> > Nicolas Liochon. This was not done at EBay.
> > In my talk, there was another comparison to show that MTTR improved a lot
> > from 0.94 to 0.96 - this was done at EBay.
> > When Stack cuts 0.96.1 RC0, you would get the list of JIRAs that
> > contributed to the speedup from 0.96.0 to 0.96.1
> > Cheers
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Jerry He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi, Ted, and hbase experts
> >> Below picture is a performance comparison between hbase 0.96.0 and
> >> 0.96.1, shared by Ted Yu in China Hadoop Summit today. This perf
> testing is
> >> said to be executed on ebay's real cluster.
> >> It is surprising 0.96.0 is such worse compared to 0.96.1 and even
> >> 0.94.14. Are these numbers official and the performance degradation
> >> What patch in 0.96.1 fixed this?