Thanks Suraj. I looked at the code but it looks like the logic is not
self-contained, particularly for the way hbase works with search for a
specific version using TimeRange.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Suraj Varma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You may need to setup your Eclipse workspace and search using
> references etc.To get started, this is one class that uses TimeRange
> based matching ...
> Also - Get is internally implemented as a Scan over a single row.
> Hope this gets you started.
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Jerry Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi St.Ack:
> > Can you tell me which source code is responsible for the logic. The
> source code in the get and scan doesnt provide an indication of how the
> setTimeRange works.
> > Best Regards,
> > Jerry
> > Sent from my iPad (sorry for spelling mistakes)
> > On 2012-07-26, at 18:30, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Jerry Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Hi St.Ack:
> >>> Let say there are 5 versions for a column A with timestamp = [0, 1, 3,
> >>> 10].
> >>> I want to execute an efficient query that returns one version of the
> >>> that has a timestamp that is equal to 5 or less. So in this case, it
> >>> return the value of the column A with timestamp = 3.
> >>> Using the setTimeRange(5, Long.MAX_VALUE) with setMaxVersion = 1, my
> >>> is that it will return the version 6 not version 3. Correct me if I'm
> >>> wrong.
> >> What Tom says, try it. IIUC, it'll give you your 3. It won't give
> >> you 6 since that is outside of the timerange (try 0 instead of
> >> MAX_VALUE; I may have misled w/ MAX_VALUE... it might work but would
> >> have to check code).
> >> St.Ack