


Decide if function is algebraic at planning phase
I would like to be able to decide if I want to use the Algebraic or regular implementation of an EvalFunc on the front end (planning phase), preferably in the function constructor. Is there any way to do this? If I implement the interface the planner will automatically attempt to use it. Returning null when implementing it in those cases also doesn't work.
Thanks, Ugljesa
+
Ugljesa Stojanovic 20121008, 19:01

Re: Decide if function is algebraic at planning phase
There is one way you could shoehorn this in. EvalFuncs can implement funcToArgMapping, which is built to allow functions to pick a different instance of themselves for different types (e.g. SUM(long) vs SUM(double)). You could implement your logic in this function and then return an EvalFunc with or without Algebraic implemented based on your choice.
Alan.
On Oct 8, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Ugljesa Stojanovic wrote:
> I would like to be able to decide if I want to use the Algebraic or regular > implementation of an EvalFunc on the front end (planning phase), preferably > in the function constructor. Is there any way to do this? If I implement > the interface the planner will automatically attempt to use it. Returning > null when implementing it in those cases also doesn't work. > > Thanks, > Ugljesa
+
Alan Gates 20121009, 15:10

Re: Decide if function is algebraic at planning phase
Thanks Alan, funcToArgMapping did the trick :)
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is one way you could shoehorn this in. EvalFuncs can implement > funcToArgMapping, which is built to allow functions to pick a different > instance of themselves for different types (e.g. SUM(long) vs SUM(double)). > You could implement your logic in this function and then return an > EvalFunc with or without Algebraic implemented based on your choice. > > Alan. > > On Oct 8, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Ugljesa Stojanovic wrote: > > > I would like to be able to decide if I want to use the Algebraic or > regular > > implementation of an EvalFunc on the front end (planning phase), > preferably > > in the function constructor. Is there any way to do this? If I implement > > the interface the planner will automatically attempt to use it. Returning > > null when implementing it in those cases also doesn't work. > > > > Thanks, > > Ugljesa > >
+
Ugljesa Stojanovic 20121010, 13:18

Re: Decide if function is algebraic at planning phase
Hi!
Out of curiosity: what for? Algebraic works faster in most cases.
Possible solutions: 1) Maybe you can disable the use of combiner or something else that is related. Maybe if you change the Configuration to pig.exec.nocombiner=true that will disable the use of Algebraic, but I am not sure, that's just a thought 2) You can embed pig into Java or Python from where you can construct pig scripts pro grammatically, using the appropriate UDF implementation
Best Regards, Ruslan
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Ugljesa Stojanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to be able to decide if I want to use the Algebraic or regular > implementation of an EvalFunc on the front end (planning phase), preferably > in the function constructor. Is there any way to do this? If I implement > the interface the planner will automatically attempt to use it. Returning > null when implementing it in those cases also doesn't work. > > Thanks, > Ugljesa
+
Ruslan AlFakikh 20121009, 07:34

