Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase, mail # dev - [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available for download


+
lars hofhansl 2013-06-24, 22:51
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-06-24, 22:53
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-06-25, 22:51
+
lars hofhansl 2013-06-29, 12:37
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-06-29, 03:06
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-03, 08:59
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-01, 11:05
+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2013-07-01, 17:35
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-01, 19:02
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-02, 18:08
+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2013-07-02, 18:22
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-02, 18:32
+
Elliott Clark 2013-07-02, 19:48
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-03, 16:16
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-04, 16:25
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-04, 16:57
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available for download
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-06, 03:24
I have redo the tests and it's now all very consistent between all the
recent versions

Min Max Average Min80% Max80% Variance Precision
hbase-0.94.5 914 1175 929 920 944 172 18.46%
hbase-0.94.6 913 1176 927 915 954 174 18.80%
hbase-0.94.7 913 1295 930 919 946 170 18.30%
hbase-0.94.8 914 947 935 914 945 166 17.78%
hbase-0.94.9 921 947 936 933 940 164 17.55%

I will try to make the tests last longer to get more precise results...

If we think a few nodes clusters is way beter for the performances
tracking, then let's work that way. But if we think PE can do the job,
it's even better ;) I just want to make sure we have accurate results
and that we performance test the right things...

I will re-run that, update the pdf and upload it again...

JM

2013/7/4 lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for doing all this work!
>
> I did find a pretty high variance between the runs, which may be at issue here.
>
> Maybe there are effects that only show on certain setups (disk drives, ram, jvm version, etc).
>
> Maybe we can compare setups offline.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 9:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available
>  for download
>
> Ok. I get similar performances between 0.94.7 and 0.94.9 for the randomRead
>
> 0.94.7 => 1124179.9ms
> 0.94.9 => 1110489.3ms
>
> I will re-run the tests one by one for all the 0.94.x versions and
> update my charts...
>
> 2013/7/3 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Ok. Test pass if I run it alone:
>>
>> mvn clean test -P runSmallTests -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
>> -Dtest=org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>  T E S T S
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook
>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 11.642 sec
>>
>> Results :
>>
>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>>
>>
>>
>> And finally passed on another one:
>> Results :
>>
>> Tests run: 1359, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>>
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] Total time: 1:33:34.925s
>> [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jul 02 16:37:59 EDT 2013
>> [INFO] Final Memory: 44M/594M
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> So it's all +1 for me.
>>
>> JM
>>
>> 2013/7/2 Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> untared.
>>> Checked the sig.
>>> Ran Ycsb.
>>> Ran PE.
>>> upgraded from 94.8.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> passes fine here too
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 11:22 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available
>>>>  for download
>>>>
>>>> Yup:
>>>>
>>>> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook
>>>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 22.756 sec
>>>>
>>>> Have you looked at the log to see on what error it fails?
>>>>
>>>> J-D
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> JD, does TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook work for you?
>>>>>
>>>>> I will retry to run it again on 3 different computers to see.
>>>>>
>>>>> JM
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/7/1 lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>> Hah. I let Cody answer here. I didn't like the empty table either, but he preferred it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Lars
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ________________________________
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-06, 16:50
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-06, 20:21
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-03, 07:55