Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> [UPDATE] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [UPDATE] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues
Is there a patch available for the tracing work mentioned? I don't think
I've seen anything about it.
On Saturday, August 3, 2013, Stack wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > The end of July is upon us.  I intend to cut a 0.95.2 next weekend and
> > 0.95.2 will be 0.96.0 but for bug fixes and migration polish.  No more
> > 'features' will be allowed after next weekend.
> >
> >
> >
> > I have done some moving around of hbase 0.95.2 issues [1] to reflect what
> > the priorities are for this week (to my mind).  It is all about polish,
> bad
> > bugs, unit test failures, and packaging/publishing/build issues.
> >
> > I'll be working on the blockers this week [2].  A few are in need of
> > reviews; e.g. "HBASE-3787 Increment is non-idempotent but client retries
> > RPC".  Feel free to take over any blockers if you'd like to help out:
> e.g.
> > "HBASE-7386 Investigate providing some supervisor support for znode
> > deletion"
> >
> > Criticals [3] are mostly just unit test issues that are probably fixed by
> > now and another few that are patches in need of test/review: e.g.
> > "HBASE-8874 PutCombiner is skipping KeyValues while combining puts of
> same
> > row during bulkload" and "HBASE-8778 Region assigments scan table
> directory
> > making them slow for huge tables".
> >  "HBASE-6127 TestAtomicOperation#testMultiRowMutationMultiThreads
> > occasionally fails" is a bad one in need of attention.  Again, if up for
> > helping out, be our guest.
> >
> > There are some great patches hanging out in the priority major issues
> > section that are patch available that could be committed but for want of
> > review: e.g. "HBASE-8369 MapReduce over snapshot files".
> >
> > Regards the big features that are racing to make the 0.96 cutoff --
> namely
> > namespaces, tags, and serialization lib -- as I see it, Francis needs
> > reviews if namespaces are to make it, tags ditto, and the serialization
> > libs are nice-to-have auxillaries that can come in at any time.  If not
> > done by the end of this week, then as I see it, these features do not
> make
> > the cut.
> >
> > Unit tests are mostly passing.  The problematics are being worked on
> (e.g.
> > JD is on the replication set -- it likely a real problem rather than a
> > flakey test).
> >
> > How's the above sound?
> > St.Ack
> >
> > P.S. It is late but if folks want to meet this week to hack in patches
> > together, just say.  I could organize an afternoon or day if you all
> think
> > it would be a good idea.
> >
> > 1.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12320040#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel
> > 2.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC
> > 3.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Critical%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC
> >
> >
> >
> UPDATE:
>
> I was to cut 0.95.2 this weekend.  I am pushing out the cut-date to Weds or
> so of next week.  The gating factor is namespaces.  It needs a few more
> days of patch cycling.  I'll cut 0.95.2 after it goes in.  It'll be the
> last feature on the 0.95/0.96 branch.  Thereafter, only bug fixes,
> migration cleanup, and doc additions will be allowed (0.96.0RC will follow
> soon after the 0.95.2 developer release goes out).
>
> It looks like the serialization ilb will make the cut, API+Ordering; Nick
> has signed-on some consumers it seems.
>
> On KV tags, we have an outstanding -1 but -1s can change; lets see what the
> new posted patch looks like.
>
> Elliott has fancy-pants tracing that he should be able to get in before
> 0.95.2.
>
> On the dodgy-looking outstanding blockers:
>
> "HBASE-3787 Increment is non-idempotent but client retries RPC" still needs
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB