Yes, you are correct that copying phase starts while the maps are running
and the reduce function is not called until everything is done but aren't
the Reduce tasks are also already 'initialized' at this point? Which, as
far as I know and might be wrong, will not have the map input records
counter (and was my point)?
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Rahul Bhattacharjee <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One question - You mentioned - "In the normal configuration, the issue
> here is that Reducers can start before all the Maps have finished so it is
> not possible to get the number (or make sense of it even if you are able
> I think , reducers would start copying the data form the completed map
> tasks , but will not start the actual reduce process until data from all
> the mappers are pulled in.
> So , the call to the counter Yorn has made might work.If invoked from the
> reduce method.
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:38 AM, java8964 java8964 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> Or you do the calculation in the reducer close() method, even though I am
>> not sure in the reducer you can get the Mapper's count.
>> But even you can't, here is what can do:
>> 1) Save the JobConf reference in your Mapper conf metehod
>> 2) Store the Map_INPUT_RECORDS counter in the configuration object as
>> your own properties, in the close() method of the mapper
>> 3) Retrieve that property in the reducer close() method, then you have
>> both numbers at that time.
>> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:49:06 -0400
>> Subject: Re: MAP_INPUT_RECORDS counter in the reducer
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In the normal configuration, the issue here is that Reducers can start
>> before all the Maps have finished so it is not possible to get the number
>> (or make sense of it even if you are able to,)
>> Having said that, you can specifically make sure that Reducers don't
>> start until all your maps have completed. It will of course slow down your
>> job. I don't know whether with this option it will work or not, but you can
>> try (until experts have some advise already.)
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Yaron Gonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> Is there a way for the reducer to get the total number of input records
>> to the map phase?
>> For example, I want the reducer to normalize a sum by dividing it in the
>> number of records. I tried getting the value of that counter by using the
>> in the reducer code, but I got 0.