Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase, mail # dev - 0.95 branch done (WAS -> Re: Heads-up! Branching 0.96 (actually 0.95) this weekend)


+
Stack 2013-02-26, 07:19
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-26, 14:47
Copy link to this message
-
Re: 0.95 branch done (WAS -> Re: Heads-up! Branching 0.96 (actually 0.95) this weekend)
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-02-26, 14:52
Is it Ted.  I tried to build it was successful for me.
Was it because of some prev trunk compilation?
Regards
Ram

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I got the following trying to build trunk:
>
> [ERROR] The build could not read 2 projects -> [Help 1]
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR]   The project org.apache.hbase:hbase-server:0.95-SNAPSHOT
> (/Users/tyu/trunk/hbase-server/pom.xml) has 1 error
> [ERROR]     'dependencies.dependency.version' for
> org.apache.hbase:hbase-prefix-tree:jar is missing. @ line 276, column 17
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR]   The project org.apache.hbase:hbase-client:0.95-SNAPSHOT
> (/Users/tyu/trunk/hbase-client/pom.xml) has 1 error
> [ERROR]     'dependencies.dependency.version' for
> org.apache.hbase:hbase-prefix-tree:jar is missing. @ line 61, column 21
>
> FYI
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I just branched 0.95 from trunk.
> >
> > The intent is that we will now let trunk go and drive to make a 0.95.0
> > release for folks to bang on so they get to try all the goodness that has
> > been baking in trunk.  After 0.95.0 goes out, dependent on feedback, we
> > might do a 0.95.1, etc., but all strictly experimental odd-number
> releases
> > that are not for production and we reserve the right to break
> compatibility
> > across 0.95 releases (if we've messed something up).
> >
> > Once we have confidence that 0.95.0 basically works, and once we have
> > figured the migration from 0.94, we'll branch 0.96 from off the 0.95
> branch
> > and will then stabilize a 0.96.0 release.  All 0.96.x releases will be
> > taken from this branch off a branch.
> >
> > The 0.95 branch is at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/branches/0.95
> >
> > I set up 0.95 builds for hadoop1 and hadoop2.  They run on same triggers
> as
> > TRUNK builds.
> >
> > In JIRA, I moved all issues with fix against 0.96.0 to instead be against
> > 0.95.0 (Issues marked fix for 0.94 and 0.96 will now just be for 0.95.0
> --
> > JIRA wouldn't let me do any different; sorry about that).  This means
> > 0.96.0 now has no issues against it.
> >
> > Let me know if I messed anything up.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > All the big code moves are done.  Let me branch now.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> You the man Elliott.  This is a big code move  so would be good to
> have
> > >> this side of the branch.  If you can't do it on the w/e, we can do it
> > >> post-branch too.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> St.Ack
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I'll try and get that to you tonight or at least this weekend so you
> > can
> > >>> branch on schedule.
> > >>> On Feb 22, 2013 4:30 PM, "Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > > When we think APIs and wire-format sufficiently stabilized,
> we'll
> > >>> then
> > >>> > > cut
> > >>> > > > a 0.96 from the 0.95 branch and release 0.96.0, etc., from here
> > on
> > >>> out.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > We need to do the client move before the branch.  Other than that
> > >>> sounds
> > >>> > > good.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > You waiting on me (rpc) Elliott?  If so, don't I'd say.  I can
> rebase
> > >>> no
> > >>> > problem and I don't see the last part of the rpc going in until it
> > has
> > >>> had
> > >>> > a good bit more review and a bit of profiling done.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Agree would be nice getting client refactor in before branch.  Its
> a
> > >>> big
> > >>> > code move.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > St.Ack
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-26, 14:55
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-26, 17:51
+
Stack 2013-02-26, 07:34
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-26, 08:50
+
Stack 2013-02-26, 17:26
+
Stack 2013-02-26, 17:52