Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> thrift vs thrift2


Copy link to this message
-
Re: thrift vs thrift2
IIRC the FB guys concluded the reverse, that it's better to provision
Thrift endpoints as a tier separate from RegionServers, so there can be
caching there, so the thrift servers in the RS don't bottleneck, etc.

On Saturday, December 8, 2012, lars hofhansl wrote:

> It's quite a useful experiment, though, standing up separate thrift
> servers adds more complexity to a deployment.
>
> If it is really abandoned we should just rip it out, no? Otherwise I'd
> think at least in principle that is useful (also considering potential
> future enhancement that we do knowing the thrift server is in process with
> the RegionServer).
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <javascript:;>>
> To: HBase Dev List <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <javascript:;>>
> Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 3:16 PM
> Subject: Re: thrift vs thrift2
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Luke Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > The embeded HRegionThriftServer should be ported to thrift2 before we
> > deprecate thrift1. FB's (and potentially others) c++ client requires
> > HRegionThriftServer.
> >
>
> HRTS is an abandoned experiment as I understand it so I closed HBASE-7302,
> the issue that would perpetuate it in thrift2.
> St.Ack

--
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)