Konstantin Boudnik 2013-10-25, 20:54
Anatoli Fomenko 2013-10-25, 20:56
Andrew Purtell 2013-10-26, 00:59
Peter Linnell 2013-10-26, 02:42
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-10-26, 03:15
Andrew Purtell 2013-10-28, 14:48
Andrew Purtell 2013-10-28, 16:28
Andrew Purtell 2013-10-28, 21:21
Peter Linnell 2013-10-30, 19:43
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-10-31, 22:02
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-10-29, 01:31
On 10/28/2013 06:31 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi Bruno!
> Thanks a million for a details and through report. A few comments.
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Bruno Mahï¿½ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am not voting yet since I still have some time, but so far I am leaning
>> toward a -1.
>> I am learning toward a -1 because of
> I would agree with that. The only trouble is I can't repro it :-(
> Could you please provide additional details on the JIRA?
> But if it is easy to repro (and I'm just missing something)
> I'd agree with you.
I updated the ticket with some more information.
If you still cannot reproduce it, feel free to ping me and I will give
you access to the instance.
At some point I was wondering if it is because I am mixing the amazon
ami with centos6 repos, but given every other service I try do work...
>> Things I still want to test (or rather, things I hope I can test by Tuesday
>> * Apache Pig and datafu
>> * Apache Solr
> I can help with that. ;-) At least with the default use case. Let me know
> if you're still interested.
Sure. Any recommendations?
>> Things we could do better:
>> * We could provide some templates for Apache Hadoop. I wasted a few hours
>> just to get the pi job running. Thankfully we have the init script for hdfs
>> (which needs some tweaks for the staging directory) and templates for the
>> configuration files in our puppet modules
> Good point.
>> * I enabled short-circuit in Apache HBase. Not sure if I missed something,
>> but I got some "org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Can't
>> continue with getBlockLocalPathInfo() authorization" exceptions. From
>> it seems there are a few things we could do to make it work out of the box
> Indeed! Would mind filing a JIRA for that. We can totally take care of this
> thing in 0.8.0.
>> * Not sure what I did wrong but although I could access Hue UI, most apps I
>> tried were not working. Ex: all shells give me the error "value 222 for UID
>> is less than the minimum UID allowed (500)". And the file browser gives me
>> the error "Cannot access: /. Note: You are a Hue admin but not a HDFS
>> superuser (which is "hdfs").". Note that the first user I created was a user
>> named "ec2-user". Although it is not an hdfs super user, I would expect to
>> have a working equivalent of what I can browse with the "hdfs -ls" command.
>> Also creating a hue user named "hdfs" yields the same result. Note that I
>> did not have time to dig further.
> At this point Puppet code is the most reliable way to deploy Hue. Part of
> it has to do that Hue now depends on way more external services than
> it uses to -- which means that you have to get configs 'just right'. Our
> puppet works great for that -- but that's for a fully distributed cluster.
I was not using puppet (on purpose).
I will give it another shot by looking at what our puppet recipes are
doing and see if any of these changes can be baked directly into our
> Were you testing on pseudo distributed?
No. Fully distributed
>> * Phoenix directly embeds Apache Hadoop, Apache HBase and Apache Zookeeper
>> jars. These jars should be symlinks.
> Looks like Andrew took care of that.
>> * Phoenix required me to delete some old Apache lucene jars from Apache
>> Flume installation directory. From the output of the command "mvn
>> dependency:tree" on the flume project, it appears these jars are only needed
>> for the ElasticSearch and MorphlineSolrSink plugins. but Flume documentation
>> for both of these plugin explicitly ask users to provide jars of Apache
>> Lucene and Apache Solr/ElasticSearch themselves (since they may use a
>> different version of Apache Lucene). So the dependency on Apache Lucene by
>> Apache Flume should probably be marked as "provided" and we should probably
Actually, it was the elasticsearch sink for flume which had me update
Apache Lucene jars.
I will probably open a ticket against Apache Flume directly sometimes
this week to ask for some clarification.
I had the same reaction.
But this was reported as blocked by noscript.
Also it seems to be a configuration activated by default:
Do you have anything particular in mind?
Not yet. But will do.
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-10-29, 22:49
Bruno Mahé 2013-10-30, 07:52