Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase, mail # dev - Patch for HBase 7295


+
Varun Sharma 2013-03-14, 15:48
+
Ted Yu 2013-03-14, 16:08
+
Varun Sharma 2013-03-14, 17:42
+
Varun Sharma 2013-03-18, 20:20
+
Ted Yu 2013-03-18, 20:28
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-18, 21:48
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Patch for HBase 7295
Varun Sharma 2013-03-18, 21:57
Sure, thanks, lars !

I am retouching this issue after a while so my memory is a little vague on
it and I may have missed something there...

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I commented on the jira. Not sure the fix is correct. Let's take the
> discussion there.
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Cc:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2013 1:28 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Patch for HBase 7295
>
> I commented on the JIRA.
> Another +1 is needed before your patch can be checked in.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Could someone take a look ? Thanks !
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ted,
> >>
> >> We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily
> >> affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly
> against
> >> 0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not
> >> seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3
> was
> >> not applying cleanly against trunk.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Varun
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The issue was logged against 0.94.3
> >>>
> >>> In your production, what version are you using ?
> >>>
> >>> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
> >>> cleanly, respectively ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back
> and
> >>> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
> >>> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone
> take
> >>> a
> >>> > look ?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks
> >>> > Varun
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>