|
|
-
Re: How to run HBase tests against 0.94? (seems to be for and old version of HBase)
Nicolas Liochon 2013-01-02, 17:19
>From what I see in 0.94 and in the jira, it should work, there is nothing fancy there.
moving to dev list btw, user in bcc. On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it works, it's ok: it's not going to give you wrong results. Just that > it adds nothing to a plain mvn test. > So if it worked for you on this patch, then you're done :-). > > This should be enough most most cases: > mvn test > > If you want to play it safe, you will run all the tests before sending the > patch. > That's mvn test -P runAllTests > > And this should work. If you have a strange error, you can clean the env > with a mvn clean install -DskipTests. > > 'P runAllTests' adds some extra tests and increases the parallelization, > but does not change the environment. > > > I'm gonna have a look at the JIRA you're working on to see if there > something that could explain the issue you're having. > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> for my code validation? What's the right way to run the tests on 0.94? > > >
-
Re: How to run HBase tests against 0.94? (seems to be for and old version of HBase)
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-01-02, 17:48
I agree, but Lars spent a lot of time to make sure the tests are working fine, and I don't want him to yell at me if something is broken ;)
dev-support/hbasetests.sh is running and seems to be working so far. I can see all the tests passing fine.
If they all pass, I will submit the patch and re-run all the tests with the mvn command line to see if it's faster.
Also, I ran mvn clean test -PrunAllTests -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Dtest=org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.cleaner.TestCleanerChore and it passed too. So I will submit the patch now.
Thanks all,
JM
2013/1/2, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > From what I see in 0.94 and in the jira, it should work, there is nothing > fancy there. > > moving to dev list btw, user in bcc. > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If it works, it's ok: it's not going to give you wrong results. Just that >> it adds nothing to a plain mvn test. >> So if it worked for you on this patch, then you're done :-). >> >> This should be enough most most cases: >> mvn test >> >> If you want to play it safe, you will run all the tests before sending >> the >> patch. >> That's mvn test -P runAllTests >> >> And this should work. If you have a strange error, you can clean the env >> with a mvn clean install -DskipTests. >> >> 'P runAllTests' adds some extra tests and increases the parallelization, >> but does not change the environment. >> >> >> I'm gonna have a look at the JIRA you're working on to see if there >> something that could explain the issue you're having. >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> for my code validation? What's the right way to run the tests on 0.94? >> >> >> >
-
Re: How to run HBase tests against 0.94? (seems to be for and old version of HBase)
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-01-03, 16:53
I ran both mvn and dev-support tests against 0.94.4RC1.
Here is dev-support results: Results : There are 127 small tests There are 136 medium tests There are 50 large tests
Tests run: 595, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 Tests run: 536, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 5 Tests run: 684, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 8
Medium and large (if selected) tests executed after 113 minutes ########################## 316 tests executed successfully 0 tests are in error 0 tests didn't finish
Tests in error are: Tests that didn't finish are:
Execution time in minutes: 113 ##########################
Here is mvn results Tests run: 1220, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 1:06:45.841s [INFO] Finished at: Thu Jan 03 11:42:35 EST 2013 [INFO] Final Memory: 44M/1185M [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mvn ran 1220 while dev-support ran 1800 (ish) tests. mvn ran almost twice faster than dev-support!
Since mvn ran less tests than dev-support, is is still correct to rely on its results? Since it's twice faster, I will prefer to use it instead of dev-support...
JM
2013/1/2, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I agree, but Lars spent a lot of time to make sure the tests are > working fine, and I don't want him to yell at me if something is > broken ;) > > dev-support/hbasetests.sh is running and seems to be working so far. I > can see all the tests passing fine. > > If they all pass, I will submit the patch and re-run all the tests > with the mvn command line to see if it's faster. > > Also, I ran mvn clean test -PrunAllTests > -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true > -Dtest=org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.cleaner.TestCleanerChore and it > passed too. So I will submit the patch now. > > Thanks all, > > JM > > 2013/1/2, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> From what I see in 0.94 and in the jira, it should work, there is nothing >> fancy there. >> >> moving to dev list btw, user in bcc. >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> If it works, it's ok: it's not going to give you wrong results. Just >>> that >>> it adds nothing to a plain mvn test. >>> So if it worked for you on this patch, then you're done :-). >>> >>> This should be enough most most cases: >>> mvn test >>> >>> If you want to play it safe, you will run all the tests before sending >>> the >>> patch. >>> That's mvn test -P runAllTests >>> >>> And this should work. If you have a strange error, you can clean the env >>> with a mvn clean install -DskipTests. >>> >>> 'P runAllTests' adds some extra tests and increases the parallelization, >>> but does not change the environment. >>> >>> >>> I'm gonna have a look at the JIRA you're working on to see if there >>> something that could explain the issue you're having. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> for my code validation? What's the right way to run the tests on 0.94? >>> >>> >>> >> >
|
|