Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop >> mail # dev >> Re-swizzle 2.3


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Re-swizzle 2.3
I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5852 as a blocker.  See
what ye all think.

Thanks,
St.Ack
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Aaron T. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I just filed this JIRA as a blocker for 2.3:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10310
>
> The tl;dr is that JNs will not work with security enabled without this fix.
> If others don't think that supporting QJM with security enabled warrants a
> blocker for 2.3, then we can certainly lower the priority, but it seems
> pretty important to me.
>
> Best,
> Aaron
>
> --
> Aaron T. Myers
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> > I just finished tuning up branch-2.3 and fixing up the HDFS and Common
> > CHANGES.txt in trunk, branch-2, and branch-2.3. I had to merge back a few
> > JIRAs committed between the swizzle and now where the fix version was 2.3
> > but weren't in branch-2.3.
> >
> > I think the only two HDFS and Common JIRAs that are marked for 2.4 are
> > these:
> >
> > HDFS-5842 Cannot create hftp filesystem when using a proxy user ugi and a
> > doAs on a secure cluster
> > HDFS-5781 Use an array to record the mapping between FSEditLogOpCode and
> > the corresponding byte value
> >
> > Jing, these both look safe to me if you want to merge them back, or I can
> > just do it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrew
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Jason Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > >  It is a bit concerning that the JIRA history showed that the target
> > version
> > > > was set at some point in the past but no record of it being cleared.
> > >
> > > Perhaps the version itself was renamed?
> > >
> > > Doug
> >
>