Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop >> mail # dev >> Logistics for releasing 2.4


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Logistics for releasing 2.4
the JIRA I referenced is ready to go -it just needs review
On 22 January 2014 20:04, Andrew Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thanks for the comments everyone.
>
> Vinod, if you think YARN-149 isn't ready yet, we can leave it out.
> Alternatively, we could release note it as "beta" with said known issues,
> and let people kick the tires. It looks like a bunch of the core
> functionality is already in place.
>
> Unless anyone else objects, I plan to cut a 2.4 branch later this week.
> Steve, Stack, if you think those two JIRAs can wrap up in that time frame
> we can include it. Since this more experiment will hopefully go well, we
> can include them in a 2.5 next month.
>
> Best,
> Andrew
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Andrew for bringing this up.
> >
> > +1 on more frequent releases and an effort at (roughly time-based
> release.
> >
> > We are working to get 'HDFS-5776 Support 'hedged' reads in DFSClient' to
> > land in time for 2.4 (but don't hold up the release for us!)
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > If the timeline is to cut one next week, I don't think we can ship
> > > YARN-149 as part of that and call it stable. There are a bunch of major
> > > things that are still missing there: YARN-1202, YARN-1410, YARN-1525
> and
> > > YARN-1611/YARN-1459.
> > >
> > > We need to start labeling individual features alpha/beta/stable now
> that
> > > we have a stable 2.2 base.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > +Vinod
> > >
> > > On Jan 21, 2014, at 1:26 PM, Andrew Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, as per my earlier email, I think a 2.4 with just HDFS-4949,
> > > HDFS-2832,
> > > > and YARN-149 would be an attractive and stable release, and is
> > something
> > > we
> > > > could actually cut this week and vote on before the month is out. The
> > > other
> > > > stuff we can ship in Feb or March when it's gotten a chance to bake
> > for a
> > > > bit, and culturally speaking, the fact that it's in 2.5 rather than
> 2.4
> > > > shouldn't be a big deal.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Suresh Srinivas <
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> There is not much progress on symlinks issue. I think we should move
> > > >> forward with 2.4 release with symlinks disabled.
> > > >>
> > > >> Status of 2.4 features from HDFS so far:
> > > >> - HDFS-2832 Heterogeneous storage support has been merged
> > > >> - HDFS-5535 rolling upgrades work is in progress
> > > >> - HDFS-4685 ACL related work is close to completion
> > > >> - HDFS-4949 As Andrew has proposed, this will be soon merged into
> 2.4
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Suresh
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Arun C Murthy <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Andrew,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'm almost ready to push out rc0 for 2.3 (been testing it
> overnight),
> > > >> I'm
> > > >>> pretty sure I'll get that out tonight.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> However, AHS (YARN-321) is very close (merge vote going on) … so
> that
> > > >>> will definitely make it in very soon.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So, my plan is essentially the same i.e. release 2.4 end of the
> month
> > > >>> (after a bit more testing of RM HA in secure mode). Thanks for the
> > > offer,
> > > >>> I'll ping you if I need any help.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> OTOH, can someone from HDFS chime in on status of symlinks?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Arun
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Jan 20, 2014, at 4:19 PM, Andrew Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I'm pretty excited to see a 2.4 this month if possible. Since I
> > think
> > > >>>> people were favorable to the idea of time-based releases, how do
> we
> > > >> feel
> > > >>>> about just cutting branch-2 and spinning up the release process
> for
> > > our

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.