This seems possible, but one thing that would need to be changed is the
directories that demux uses. For example:
These would need to dynamic directories with the timestamp or something else
in them to keep two jobs from interfering with each other.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Corbin Hoenes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finding demux to be a bit too slow for our needs. It seems like only 1
> runs at a time; is there some technical reason why we couldn't run a couple
> in parallel? If so any hints on how difficult it would be to run multiple
> demuxers at a time?