Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259) Snapshot backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)


Copy link to this message
-
Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259) Snapshot backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)
That said, doing a release (even a point release) is some work. I typically go through every single outstanding issue and decide whether to get that in or push it, teasing out related issues, etc.
In this case I would wholesale move all 0.94.7 to 0.94.8 and declare 0.94.7 done.

-- Lars

________________________________
 From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259) Snapshot backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)
 
Pulling 0.94.6 is another option.

________________________________
From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: HBase Dev List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259) Snapshot backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)

+1 on 0.94.7 rather than 0.94.6.1.

Chatting w/ JD and Aleks, we should pull 0.94.6.  I can add note up on
webpage to explain the hole.

Can I help w/ the 0.94.7 rolling?

St.Ack
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> My problem with delaying getting this patch out there is that people
> who adopt 0.94.6 are putting themselves in a hole because you also
> can't roll restart out of it.
>
> J-D
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Third 0.94.6 RC was cut on Mar. 14th.
> > It has been almost 3 weeks since them. Meaning we have sizable goodies
> for
> > the next release.
> >
> > I would vote for 0.94.7 release which would come in April anyway.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> We might wanna bring this discussion here on dev@.
> >>
> >> So right now the questions are:
> >>
> >>  - Should we call a release with just HBASE-8259 as 0.94.6.1 or
> >> 0.94.7? How much testing are we expecting from folks?
> >>  - Should we just cut a release with what's in the branch and call it
> >> 0.94.7?
> >>
> >> My opinion is to release 0.94.6.1 with just HBASE-8259 to replace the
> >> current 0.94.6. Have the normal unit test run and release based on the
> >> +1s we gather.
> >>
> >> J-D
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Ted Yu (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >     [
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13622514#comment-13622514
> ]
> >> >
> >> > Ted Yu commented on HBASE-8259:
> >> > -------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > What level of verification effort are you expecting ?
> >> > If normal procedure of validating a release is involved, 0.94.7
> release
> >> seems to be a better fit.
> >> >
> >> >> Snapshot backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------
> >> >>
> >> >>                 Key: HBASE-8259
> >> >>                 URL:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8259
> >> >>             Project: HBase
> >> >>          Issue Type: Bug
> >> >>    Affects Versions: 0.94.6
> >> >>            Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> >> >>            Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi
> >> >>            Priority: Blocker
> >> >>             Fix For: 0.94.7
> >> >>
> >> >>         Attachments: HBASE-8259-v0.patch
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> [~aleksshulman] found with his nifty QA tools that 0.94.6 has an
> >> incompatible change due to HBASE-7360 (Snapshot 0.94 Backport) that
> breaks
> >> rolling restarts.
> >> >> RegionTransitionData.write() uses eventType.ordinal() that is the
> index
> >> in the enum and not the value specified in the enum definition. It
> means we
> >> can't add new states in the middle of the list. This can be fixed by
> moving
> >> C_M_SNAPSHOT_TABLE and C_M_RESTORE_SNAPSHOT at the end of the list.
> Trunk
> >> does the right thing already.
> >> >> Right now, RIT znodes created with 0.94.6 (or top of the branch) will
> >> use the wrong value for the event type. You will see things like:
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB