Jakob Homan 2011-07-12, 00:11
Todd Lipcon 2011-07-12, 00:17
Jakob Homan 2011-07-12, 00:27
Eli Collins 2011-07-12, 00:41
Jakob Homan 2011-07-12, 00:44
Aaron T. Myers 2011-07-12, 00:56
Dhruba Borthakur 2011-07-12, 04:22
Doug Cutting 2011-07-12, 16:47
Stack 2011-07-12, 17:01
-Re: [VOTE] Change bylaws to require 3 binding +1s for branch merge
Tsz Wo Sze 2011-07-13, 07:26
From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Change bylaws to require 3 binding +1s for branch merge
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 Sounds good to me.
> Something like the following?
> Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
> =================================================================> <p>Lazy consensus of active committers, but with a minimum of
> - one +1. The code can be committed after the first +1.</p></li>
> + one +1. The code can be committed after the first +1, unless
> + the code change represents a merge from a branch, in which case
> + three +1s are required.</p></li>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching models, I'd
>> like to amend the bylaws to provide that branches should get a minimum
>> of three committer +1s before being merged to trunk.
>> The rationale:
>> Feature branches are often created in order that developers can
>> iterate quickly without the review then commit requirements of trunk.
>> Branches' commit requirements are determined by the branch maintainer
>> and in this situation are often set up as commit-then-review. As
>> such, there is no way to guarantee that the entire changeset offered
>> for trunk merge has had a second pair of eyes on it. Therefore, it is
>> prudent to give that final merge heightened scrutiny, particularly
>> since these branches often extensively affect critical parts of the
>> system. Requiring three binding +1s does not slow down the branch
>> development process, but does provide a better chance of catching bugs
>> before they make their way to trunk.
>> Specifically, under the Actions subsection, this vote would add a new
>> bullet item:
>> * Branch merge: A feature branch that does not require the same
>> criteria for code to be committed to trunk will require three binding
>> +1s before being merged into trunk.
>> The last bylaw change required lazy majority of PMC and ran for 7
>> days, which I believe would apply to this one as well. That would
>> have this vote ending 5pm PST July 18.
Nigel Daley 2011-07-13, 21:09
Arun C Murthy 2011-07-12, 04:26
Mahadev Konar 2011-07-12, 04:30
Todd Lipcon 2011-07-12, 04:38
Suresh Srinivas 2011-07-12, 04:44
Tom White 2011-07-13, 21:36
Owen O'Malley 2011-07-15, 16:18
Jakob Homan 2011-07-22, 20:26