Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> Drop version part of jar filenames in $ACCUMULO_HOME/lib


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Drop version part of jar filenames in $ACCUMULO_HOME/lib
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Why do we need the version part of the filename in $ACCUMULO_HOME/lib?
>
> It seems to me that it would be cleaner to unpack the tarball on top
> of an existing $ACCUMULO_HOME/ and overwrite the jars in lib/.
>

Do we want to encourage unpacking the tarball on top of an existing
installation?  This seems like something that could be error-prone.  I
prefer keeping separate directories for each installation and symlinking
the one I want to use to my standard ACCUMULO_HOME.

Billie

>
> For the RPM/DEB, the versions of the files are tracked in the RPMDB
> (or equivalent DEB database), so they aren't needed there either.
>
> It would make our scripts slightly more manageable (files have a
> predictable name that doesn't need to be updated each version).
>
> I'm curious what the argument(s) against dropping the version from the
> jars in lib/ are.
>
> The way we copy jars currently to lib/ is with the
> maven-dependency-plugin, and that already has a built-in feature to
> drop the version part of the filename when it copies. It seems to make
> sense, and I see no argument against it.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB