-RE: For a new installation: use the BackupNode or the CheckPointNode?
So... the answer is... SecondaryNameNode is what I should be installing
here. And the SecondaryNameNode is essentially just an earlier version of
the checkpoint node, in terms of functionality. If I understood everything
correctly. Can you confirm?
From: Harsh J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 5:33 PM
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: For a new installation: use the BackupNode or the
Neither CheckpointNode nor BackupNode exists in version 1.x. This was a
documentation oversight that should be cleared in the docs now (or by next
release I think).
And on 2.x, neither has been tested for stability and the SecondaryNameNode
continues to exist and is fully supported (not deprecated).
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:34 PM, varun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hope below link will be useful..
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:29 PM, David Parks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For a new installation of the current stable build (1.1.2 ), is there
>> any reason to use the CheckPointNode over the BackupNode?
>> It seems that we need to choose one or the other, and from the docs
>> it seems like the BackupNode is more efficient in its processes.
> Varun Kumar.P