I am currently benchmarking Kafka against ActiveMQ and I got some results
the surprised my quite a lot. ActiveMQ managed to deliver 4x more messages
when running locally. But from all what I was reading I am a little bit
surprised. Honestly I expected Kafka to outperform ActiveMQ. Some I am left
with the feeling that I configured some wrong or did any kind of other

My setup looks like this:

- One local broker
- 10 Topic / Queues
- 1 producer that dispatches messages randomly to the topics
- 1 consumer per topic

I basically used the example on the Kafka web page.

Also I encountered some issues when increasing the number of topics, lets
say 100. In this case the consumer cannot connect the Zookeeper...

Does anybody has an idea how to improve the performance?

Klaus Schaefers
Senior Optimization Manager

Ligatus GmbH
Hohenstaufenring 30-32
D-50674 Köln

Tel.:  +49 (0) 221 / 56939 -784
Fax:  +49 (0) 221 / 56 939 - 599
Web: www.ligatus.de

HRB Köln 56003
Dipl.-Kaufmann Lars Hasselbach, Dipl.-Kaufmann Klaus Ludemann,
Dipl.-Wirtschaftsingenieur Arne Wolter

NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB