If you use a reasonable fetch size in the consumer (e.g. 100+KB) or above,
you could probably get most of the sequential scan performance from those
disks. Do you mean 250 Mbits or MBytes?

Thanks,

Jun
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Graeme Wallace <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB