As suggested on the website, this is a friendly nag. I submitted a patch for a config change. Can someone please take a look?
Here's the message I posted to the users list:
OK. I've submitted a patch along with unit tests. This change is backward compatible with two new optional parameters called advertise.host.name and advertise.port. The reason I called them that instead of zkHost.name and zkHost.port is that the zkHost.* names sound like they represent the host and port of a ZooKeeper server rather than the host and port info of the broker that gets published to ZK.
# Hostname the broker will advertise to producers and consumers. If not set, it uses the # value for "host.name" if configured. Otherwise, it will use the value returned from # java.net.InetAddress.getCanonicalHostName(). #advertise.host.name=<hostname routable by clients>
# The port to publish to ZooKeeper for clients to use. If this is not set, # it will publish the same port that the broker binds to. #advertise.port=<port accessible by clients>
I've fixed the two things you mentioned. All the tests now pass.
Roger On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Roger Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
Apache Lucene, Apache Solr and all other Apache Software Foundation project and their respective logos are trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation.
Elasticsearch, Kibana, Logstash, and Beats are trademarks of Elasticsearch BV, registered in the U.S. and in other countries. This site and Sematext Group is in no way affiliated with Elasticsearch BV.
Service operated by Sematext