Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> Using powermock-api-mockito in tests?

Copy link to this message
RE: Using powermock-api-mockito in tests?

  I was not trying to prevent you from being productive, I was trying to
prevent you from wasting your time. I stated several times that
MiniDFSCluster does not work on Windows. I'll try to be more specific.

 After you mock the bash execution, you will likely find that you have
broken the test for everyone else because MiniDFSCluster expects a certain
directory permission, see [1] and [2] for lengthy discussions on the topic.
In addition, when you get to the point of starting MiniDFSCluster, you will
find that it does not work on Windows due to non-portable paths and such,
see [3]. At that point you will be left with removing MiniDFSCluster and
mocking every call to HDFS from the tests.

  I think a better solution is to move the classloader tests that use
AccumuloDFSBase to integration tests. These can be run on Hudson, which I
think is using a *nix flavor of O/S and should run with no problem. Maybe a
future version of MiniDFSCluster will work on Windows.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-708
[3] http://www.google.com/#q=MiniDFSCluster+windows+paths&hl=en

-----Original Message-----
From: David Medinets [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: Using powermock-api-mockito in tests?

How does it hurt the project if I spend time on this? Accumulo already
compiles on Windows. It's the tests that are failing. How does skipping
failing tests help? I suggest that unit tests should not spawn exec
processes in any case because that is a source of slowness.
Mocking the unix-specific stuff on Windows will lead to faster tests.

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Jim Klucar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 to Dave's comment. I don't think we should be spending effort
> +supporting
> compiling on an unsupported runtime environment. If something fails
> because it is too *nix-y then just skip that test with a local pom.xml
> override or something.
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:16 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > So we are getting into an area where you want to compile the
>> > software on
>> a platform that is not supported. If you want to compile on an
>> unsupported platform, then I would suggest just ignoring the tests
>> that won't work on that system.
>> My thought on this is that if changes to make it work on windows
>> improve the test and/or build process, then thats good.  On the other
>> hand I would be opposed to making test and/or build more complex
>> inorder to support windows.   I would define increasing complexity as
>> making it more difficult to run, maintain, or improve the test and/or
>> build process.
>> >
>> > I don't think that this needs to be changed now as Hadoop only
>> > supports
>> *nix based systems and we are close to a 1.5.0 release. If you want
>> to tackle this in 1.6 (trunk) thats a different story.
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "David Medinets" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 10:08:48 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Using powermock-api-mockito in tests?
>> >
>> > I hate ignoring things. It makes me uneasy. I'm looking at the
>> > other tests as well. For example, the AccumuloDFSBase class depends
>> > on running /bin/sh to find a umask. No reason that dependency can't
>> > be mocked out during testing... If nothing else, this research will
>> > form my own set of Accumulo Zen Koans.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:03 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Take a look at my other email on this subject, it might be better
>> >> to
>> just add the profile that I mentioned and add this to the list of
>> ignored tests for now. I know that there is a ticket for removing
>> ACCUMULO_HOME in all places.
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----