|
|
-
[VOTE] New branch for HDFS-1052 development
Suresh Srinivas 2010-08-20, 00:07
I am planning to create a new branch from the trunk for the work related to HDFS-1052 - HDFS scalability using multiple namenodes/namespaces. Please see the jira for more details. Doing the development in a separate branch will reduce the churn on the trunk. The development will be done incrementally in the new branch using multiple sub jiras. When the development and testing is complete, the changes from this branch will be promoted back to trunk.
Regards, Suresh
+
Suresh Srinivas 2010-08-20, 00:07
-
Re: [VOTE] New branch for HDFS-1052 development
Tsz Wo \ 2010-08-20, 00:32
Do we need a vote for creating a development branch? It seems to me that we do
not have such votes before. The committer just go ahead creating a branch.
Nicholas
----- Original Message ----
> From: Suresh Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 5:07:14 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] New branch for HDFS-1052 development
>
> I am planning to create a new branch from the trunk for the work related to
>HDFS-1052 - HDFS scalability using multiple namenodes/namespaces. Please see the
>jira for more details. Doing the development in a separate branch will reduce
>the churn on the trunk. The development will be done incrementally in the new
>branch using multiple sub jiras. When the development and testing is complete,
>the changes from this branch will be promoted back to trunk.
> Regards, Suresh
>
+
Tsz Wo \ 2010-08-20, 00:32
-
Re: [VOTE] New branch for HDFS-1052 development
Doug Cutting 2010-08-20, 21:50
On 08/19/2010 05:32 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote:
> Do we need a vote for creating a development branch?
I don't think a vote is required. I agree that any committer should be
able to create a branch.
Note however, that, if a committer were to wish to create a branch that
alters, e.g., the RAID fs stuff or a Common API that's used by both HDFS
and MapReduce, then they'd have to be a committer in both HDFS and
MapReduce. So not all committers are able to create feature branches
equally, just as not all committers are able to create release branches.
For the record, I find this distinction counter-productive.
Doug
+
Doug Cutting 2010-08-20, 21:50
-
Re: [VOTE] New branch for HDFS-1052 development
Suresh Srinivas 2010-08-20, 23:02
Thanks Doug for the clarification. Thanks to others who votes :-). I have created the branch HDFS-1052 off of trunk.
On 8/20/10 2:50 PM, "Doug Cutting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 08/19/2010 05:32 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote:
> Do we need a vote for creating a development branch?
I don't think a vote is required. I agree that any committer should be
able to create a branch.
Note however, that, if a committer were to wish to create a branch that
alters, e.g., the RAID fs stuff or a Common API that's used by both HDFS
and MapReduce, then they'd have to be a committer in both HDFS and
MapReduce. So not all committers are able to create feature branches
equally, just as not all committers are able to create release branches.
For the record, I find this distinction counter-productive.
Doug
+
Suresh Srinivas 2010-08-20, 23:02
-
Re: [VOTE] New branch for HDFS-1052 development
Dhruba Borthakur 2010-08-20, 05:00
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 19, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Suresh Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am planning to create a new branch from the trunk for the work
> related to HDFS-1052 - HDFS scalability using multiple namenodes/
> namespaces. Please see the jira for more details. Doing the
> development in a separate branch will reduce the churn on the trunk.
> The development will be done incrementally in the new branch using
> multiple sub jiras. When the development and testing is complete,
> the changes from this branch will be promoted back to trunk.
> Regards, Suresh
+
Dhruba Borthakur 2010-08-20, 05:00
-
Re: [VOTE] New branch for HDFS-1052 development
newpant 2010-08-20, 06:06
+1 good idea
2010/8/20 Dhruba Borthakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +1
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Suresh Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> I am planning to create a new branch from the trunk for the work related to
>> HDFS-1052 - HDFS scalability using multiple namenodes/namespaces. Please see
>> the jira for more details. Doing the development in a separate branch will
>> reduce the churn on the trunk. The development will be done incrementally in
>> the new branch using multiple sub jiras. When the development and testing is
>> complete, the changes from this branch will be promoted back to trunk.
>> Regards, Suresh
>>
>
+
newpant 2010-08-20, 06:06
-
Re: [VOTE] New branch for HDFS-1052 development
Hairong Kuang 2010-08-20, 06:06
+1. Look forward to the feature completion.
Hairong
On 8/19/10 10:00 PM, "Dhruba Borthakur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Suresh Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I am planning to create a new branch from the trunk for the work
>> related to HDFS-1052 - HDFS scalability using multiple namenodes/
>> namespaces. Please see the jira for more details. Doing the
>> development in a separate branch will reduce the churn on the trunk.
>> The development will be done incrementally in the new branch using
>> multiple sub jiras. When the development and testing is complete,
>> the changes from this branch will be promoted back to trunk.
>> Regards, Suresh
+
Hairong Kuang 2010-08-20, 06:06
|
|
