Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Sqoop >> mail # dev >> Review Request: SQOOP-528: Remove references to incubator from sources


+
Jarek Cecho 2012-07-31, 19:35
+
Jarek Cecho 2012-08-01, 15:23
+
Abhijeet Gaikwad 2012-08-01, 17:46
+
Bilung Lee 2012-08-02, 18:03
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Review Request: SQOOP-528: Remove references to incubator from sources

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6248/#review9688
-----------------------------------------------------------
Except the two comments, all seems fine to me.
"ant docs" - success for me.
/DISCLAIMER.txt
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/6248/#comment20656>

    As Apache Sqoop is a Top Level Project now, this whole paragraph talking about on-going incubation of the project seems old.
    Do we require this file any more?

/pom-old.xml
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/6248/#comment20657>

    Not related to your change here, but do we need to update this version?
- Abhijeet Gaikwad
On July 31, 2012, 7:35 p.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/6248/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated July 31, 2012, 7:35 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Sqoop.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> I've removed references to the incubator.
>
>
> This addresses bug SQOOP-528.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-528
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
>   /DISCLAIMER.txt 1367605
>   /ivy/sqoop-test.xml 1367605
>   /ivy/sqoop.xml 1367605
>   /pom-old.xml 1367605
>   /src/docs/dev/compiling.txt 1367605
>   /src/docs/dev/preface.txt 1367605
>   /src/docs/user/preface.txt 1367605
>   /src/docs/user/support.txt 1367605
>   /src/docs/web/footer.xsl 1367605
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6248/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jarek Cecho
>
>

+
Jarek Cecho 2012-08-01, 15:15