Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> [VOTE] The 1st hbase-0.96.0 release candidate is available for download


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase-0.96.0 release candidate is available for download
Sorry for not being clear.

I have setup the logs level to WARN in the property file, and I still see
an INFO message. I would have expected it to not beeing displayed.

Thanks for looking at the performance impact.

JM
2013/9/3 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>
> > There was a typo in my log4j.properties :(
> >
> > So it's working fine.
> >
> > The only INFO logs I still see are those one:
> > 2013-09-03 09:53:07,313 INFO  [M:0;t430s:45176] mortbay.log: Logging to
> > org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via
> > org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog
> > 2013-09-03 09:53:07,350 INFO  [M:0;t430s:45176] mortbay.log: jetty-6.1.26
> > But there is only very few of them.
> >
> >
> Pardon me JMS, but is the point that INFO log level doesn't show you enough
> of what is going on?  If you have set hbase to INFO-level logging, what you
> get is not enough to tell what is happening?
>
>
>
> > Performances wise, here are the numbers (the higher, the better. Rows per
> > seconds, expect for scans where it's rows/min). As you will see, 0.96 is
> > slower only for RandomSeekScanTest (way slower) and RandomScanWithRange10
> > but is faster for everything else. I ran the tests with the default
> > settings. So I think we should look at RandomSeekScanTest but expect this
> > one, everything else is pretty good.
> >
>
> ....
>
>
> >
> > 0.96.0RC0 0.94.11
> >  org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$FilteredScanTest 10.28
> 10.17
> > 101.12%  org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomReadTest
> > 966.01
> > 810.58 119.18%
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomSeekScanTest 98.50
> > 255.71 38.52%
> >  org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomWriteTest
> > 39251.17 25682.11 152.83%
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomScanWithRange10Test
> > 25844.88 28715.29 90.00%
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomScanWithRange100Test
> > 20029.48 18022.39 111.14%
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomScanWithRange1000Test
> > 2692.16 2346.85 114.71%
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$SequentialReadTest 3002.18
> > 2875.83 104.39%
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$SequentialWriteTest
> 38995.50
> > 26693.23 146.09%
> >
> >
> >
>
> Thanks JMS.  Let me dig in on the slow ones.  In general little-by-way of
> profiling has been done on 0.96 so far.  Should be a bunch to clean up.
>
> St.Ack
>