Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop, mail # dev - Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.0-beta


+
Arpit Agarwal 2013-08-06, 17:42
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.0-beta
Daryn Sharp 2013-08-19, 15:25
I've been OOO (got a call to fix this bug), but just to clarify:

We're ok with HA _not working at all_ with security enabled in 2.1.0-beta?  That's the ramification of omitting HADOOP-9880.

Daryn

On Aug 16, 2013, at 9:20 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> Yep, there are quite a number of such fixes in 2.1.1 ATM, I think it will serve us better to get 2.1.0 out and then quickly turn around to make 2.1.1.
>
> My current plan is to start work on 2.1.1 right after this release gets complete… hopefully next week.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> On Aug 16, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> There are other such isolated and well understood bug-fixes that we pushed to 2.1.1 in the interesting of making progress with 2.1.0 and the corresponding API changes.
>>
>> 2.1.1 should happen soon enough after this.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Aug 16, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>>> What are the downsides of getting this fix into the 2.1? It appears
>>> that the fix is pretty isolated and well understood.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Roman.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Kihwal Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I've changed the target version of HADOOP-9880 to 2.1.1.  Please change it back, if you feel that it needs to be in 2.1.0-beta.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kihwal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Kihwal Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: Arun Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 4:55 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.0-beta
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's your call, Arun.  I.e. as long you believe rc2 meets the expectations and objectives of 2.1.0-beta.
>>>>
>>>> Kihwal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Arun Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Cc: Kihwal Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 3:44 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.0-beta
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That makes sense too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We need to make a call on what blockers will be. From my limited understanding, this doesn't seem like a API or a compatibility issue. Can we not fix it in subsequent bug-fix releases?
>>>>>
>>>>> I do see a lot of follow up releases to 2.1.0. Getting this release out will help downstream projects start testing with all the API stuff that has already gone in 2.1.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Kihwal Lee wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We have found HADOOP-9880, which prevents Namenode HA from running with security.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kihwal
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>> From: Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 4:15 PM
>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.0-beta
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've created a release candidate (rc2) for hadoop-2.1.0-beta that I would like to get released - this fixes the bugs we saw since the last go-around (rc1).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.1.0-beta-rc2/
+
Sandy Ryza 2013-08-21, 08:37
+
Andrew Wang 2013-09-17, 13:51