Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo, mail # dev - GSOC Idea - Accumulo Control Panel


Copy link to this message
-
Re: GSOC Idea - Accumulo Control Panel
Andres Danter 2013-04-14, 20:22
Billie,

I'm a newbie at creating tickets on JIRA.  I want to make sure I have the
right information for each of the fields:

Project:  Ambari
Issue Type: Task  (or Wish?)
Summary:  Integrate Ambari with Accumulo
Priority:  Minor (?)
Components:  build (?)
Affects Versions:  <blank>
Fix Versions: <blank>
Environment: <blank>
Description:  This task is for Google Summer of Code 2013.  The goal is to
integrate Ambari with Accumulo to provide a more robust and extensible
management layer for Accumulo clusters.  The Accumulo tickets related to
this Ambari task are the following:
ACCUMULO-136
ACCUMULO-196

Original Estimate:  <blank>
Labels: gsoc2013, Accumulo

Is the description enough, or should I add more information?

Once I get your blessing, I'll create the ticket.

Thanks,

Andres
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Billie Rinaldi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> On Apr 13, 2013 3:17 PM, "Andres Danter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Billie,
> >
> > Thanks for passing the information onto the Ambari group.  I'm glad that
> > they were receptive.  I will subscribe to the Ambari dev group later
> > today.  Do you need me to create the Ambari ticket?
>
> Yes, that would be great. Thanks, Andres.
>
> Billie
>
> >
> > Andres
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Billie Rinaldi
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> > > Andres,
> > >
> > > I approached the Ambari PMC and they responded positively. In
> particular,
> > > Yusaku had the following comment about your outline:
> > >
> > > "That sounds like a great idea, Billie.
> > > Adding Accumulo support will provide an excellent example on how to
> extend
> > > the stack and plug it into Ambari for installation, management, and
> > > monitoring.
> > > This will help future effort by the community to add additional service
> > > component to be Ambari-compatible.  Also this project will help
> discover
> > > any improvements that need to be made in order to ease such stack
> extension
> > > effort.
> > > BTW, Ambari has the framework to support 2 and 7 as it does with other
> > > service components."
> > >
> > > Go ahead and subscribe to the Ambari dev list, if you haven't already.
> We
> > > should also open an Ambari ticket for the project and link it to
> relevant
> > > Accumulo ticket(s).
> > >
> > > Additional monitoring features will be a good thing to add if you get
> done
> > > the other goals and still have some time left. Ambari is currently
> doing
> > > the same thing for HBase, so hopefully we can learn from them.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to working with you!
> > > Billie
> > > On Apr 12, 2013 5:58 PM, "Andres Danter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks, Billie.  I'm liking this task more and more.  I would love to
> take
> > >> this on for GSoC.  Please run it by the Ambari PMC.  I will start
> drafting
> > >> the proposal this weekend.
> > >>
> > >> Just to be clear, the goal would be to integrate Ambari with Accumulo
> in
> > >> order to achieve the following capabilities (I've expanded David's
> > >> original
> > >> list of features):
> > >>
> > >> 1. Control (start/stop) Accumulo processes on any cluster node
> > >> 2. Have the ability to edit Accumulo configuration files via a
> web-based
> > >> editor (I don't think Ambari provides this.  Please let me know if I'm
> > >> wrong)
> > >> 3. Have the ability to schedule restart of Accumulo processes after a
> > >> configuration change
> > >> 4. Push Accumulo code and configuration files to a new cluster node
> > >> 5.  Gracefully remove a node from a cluster
> > >> 6.  Gather system and/or application metrics that can be used to
> monitor
> > >> the system and perhaps create reports on usability
> > >> 7.  Be able to monitor and control the Accumulo cluster from a
> web-based
> > >> GUI  (this kind of goes with #2 above)
> > >> 8.  Allow read-only monitor sessions, as well as full-admin sessions
> and
> > >> have the ability to strictly manage who can access either.  (this I
> got