-Re: [DISCUSS] Patch available backlog
Edward Ribeiro 2013-05-13, 17:01
Agree with Patrick and, in my opinion, Thawan's "local session" patch and
Skye's jetty support should be high priority on list. After Alex's dynamic
config, those two patches should be evaluated asap.
I have been reviewing both patches at Review Board, as far as my n00b
knowledge of ZK inner works permits, but I'd love to see more patches at
review board! I am glad to help so let's get it started. Count me in!
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tues-thurs evenings next week would work for me.
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > I was checking the issues on jira and I realized that we have currently
> > 76 patch available issues. This is a fairly large number and I'd like
> > help to get that number down. One way is to split issues among the folks
> > willing to review patches. It would be great to have committers signing
> > to review patches, but we can definitely get contributors helping with
> > reviews and I actually encourage reviews from contributors as well.
> > >
> > I had been reviewing them at least every month. However with the
> > recent big patches going in (scalability changes, dynamic
> > reconfig,...) I held off to not impact/delay those patches. I've been
> > super busy at home/work but I'll try to find some time, It would be
> > great if other folks jumped in. They key I've found is to set aside
> > some time and just focus on crunching through. I'd love to see 3.4.6
> > and 3.5.0 releases soon. We have some good fixes for 3.5.6, and there
> > are only a couple of major 3.5.0 issues to go, if we could get
> > Thawan's "local session" patch and Skye's jetty support in, as well as
> > a few high priority 3.5 fixes (1324 in particular) I'd love to cut a
> > beta release candidate for 3.5.
> > > To split the load, one idea is to set up an hour or two for us to be
> > simultaneously on irc to discuss the split and any contention on issues.
> > But, if this idea doesn't work, I would be very happy to hear
> > Ultimately I'm interested in making progress with the patches submitted.
> > >
> > This is a good idea, but I find that just a single person reviewing
> > the patch is often sufficient. Once you boil things down a bit (I typ.
> > find that ~30% of the patches are pretty simple and easy to commit)
> > it's good to have a couple folks focus on the tougher/remaining
> > issues. Esp if it involves a "feature" level change.
> > > If you agree with the idea of being on irc, please share some slots
> > suit you.
> > >
> > I'm almost always on email or im. FF to ping me if you need to discuss
> > something.
> > Patrick