Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> HBase 0.94.1


+
lars hofhansl 2012-07-06, 00:36
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2012-07-09, 15:35
+
lars hofhansl 2012-07-09, 23:07
+
Ted Yu 2012-07-09, 23:38
+
lars hofhansl 2012-07-09, 23:46
+
Ted Yu 2012-07-10, 00:04
+
Jesse Yates 2012-07-10, 00:27
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-07-10, 00:52
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-07-10, 00:43
+
Ted Yu 2012-07-10, 01:09
Copy link to this message
-
Re: HBase 0.94.1
If you go to one of the download mirrors and click "stable" it brings you
to a 0.92.1 release, not a 0.94.0 release.
For example: http://www.bizdirusa.com/mirrors/apache/hbase/stable/

What is a user supposed to conclude from that?  That 0.94 is not yet stable?
Greg

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Andy:
> Good questions.
>
> The fact that HBASE-6311 is deemed by Lars to be an important fix adds
> support for my reasoning.
>
> I read the posts under 'ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is
> available for download' again.
>
> There was discussion on 'Dictionary WAL compression making replication not
> functional' which later was marked as experimental.
> This message from LarsH on May 13th is notable:
>
> 'If there are no -1's by Wed, May 16th, I'll release RC4 as 0.94.0.'
>
> To answer the last question below, I think we should allow ample time for
> HBase users to try out the RC before declaration of the release.
> We're building something that one day would take away significant chunk of
> market share from traditional RDBMS vendors. Quality should always be our
> top priority.
>
> I would anticipate wider participation in validating 0.94.1 this time.
> To my knowledge, Cloudera, Huawei and Taobao have all been actively testing
> 0.94 builds for some time. That was why critical issues were raised.
> This should have laid better foundation for the release of 0.94.1
>
> Cheers
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> > Ted,
> >
> > Please explain in more detail why 0.94.0 was not a stable release. And
> > what about 0.94.1 is different that it should be considered stable now?
> And
> > since 0.94.0 was, as you contend, an unstable release, how did it get by
> > the RC process and what can we do to improve the RC process so that does
> > not happen again? Thanks.
> >
> >     - Andy
> >
> > On Jul 9, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > 0.94.0 was not a stable release.
> > > I hope 0.94.1 would be stable. My rationale was that deprecating
> current
> > > metric classes in the first stable release of 0.94 should be
> acceptable.
> > >
> > > I would humbly listen to other people's opinions, of course.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:46 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> 0.94 is already out and did not have these deprecated. So deprecating
> > them
> > >> now in a point release is a bit strange.
> > >> Not -1'ing it, just raising that thought here.
> > >>
> > >> As said below because of HBASE-6311 0.94.1 should get out soon. If
> push
> > >> comes to shuff are folks ok with:
> > >> 1. deprecating in a point release
> > >> 2. maybe doing that in 0.94.2
> > >> ?
> > >>
> > >> Lastly, I don't think we need to deprecate now in order in remove in
> > 0.96.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks.
> > >>
> > >> -- Lars
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> Cc:
> > >> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 4:38 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: HBase 0.94.1
> > >>
> > >> If possible, can you wait for the poll on metrics2 framework to close
> ?
> > >> If the poll passes, 0.94.1 RC would carry deprecation for (old) metric
> > >> classes.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> That's great, thanks for setting this up Roman!
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> There're only three issues left against 0.94.1.
> > >>> I want to push it out quickly because of HBASE-6311.
> > >>>
> > >>> I am 90% sure there'll be a first RC this week.
> > >>>
> > >>> -- Lars
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>> From: Roman Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>> Cc:
> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 8:35 AM
> > >>> Subject: Re: HBase 0.94.1
+
Stack 2012-07-10, 16:37
+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2012-07-10, 16:55
+
lars hofhansl 2012-07-10, 17:40
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-07-10, 06:38
+
lars hofhansl 2012-07-10, 04:15
+
Ted Yu 2012-07-10, 08:56
+
Stack 2012-07-10, 16:33
+
Stack 2012-07-10, 16:23
+
Ted Yu 2012-07-10, 16:57
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-07-10, 17:14
+
Ted Yu 2012-07-10, 17:32
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-07-10, 17:34
+
Ted Yu 2012-07-10, 17:50
+
Elliott Clark 2012-07-10, 18:19
+
Ted Yu 2012-07-10, 03:59
+
lars hofhansl 2012-07-10, 04:17