-Re: HBase code coverage and code analysis available on analysis.apache.org.
I think part of the problem they (INFRA) had was that the findbugs wasn't
able to pick up our existing (incomplete) list of findbugs violations. We
never got findbugs to 0 we haven't started enforcing it.
If anyone is interested in improving this analysis page, go ahead and run
with it. I think we'd all appreciate it. :)
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also the 'array is stored directly' violation class, lots of probable
> false positives there due to our use of byte
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Yeah there are some really great things in there. Thanks.
> > Is there anyway to have an ignore list like findbugs, so generated code
> > be ignored ?
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:21 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> There are some gems in there.
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:58 PM
> >> Subject: HBase code coverage and code analysis available on
> >> analysis.apache.org.
> >> Hooray! we have a "sonar" code coverage and code metrics job setup on
> >> analysis.apache.org!
> >> https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.hbase:hbase
> >> It looks like it may only run the small tests, but this still provides
> >> data points.
> >> I found this especially interesting:
> >> This was filed a ways back as INFRA-4581 -- if we have other things we
> >> to add tweak, we could file more INFRA jiras.
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4581<
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4581#comment-13455178>
> >> Jon.
> >> --
> >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> >> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >> // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Best regards,
> - Andy
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// [EMAIL PROTECTED]