In ClientCnxn, 'readTimeOut' is calculated as follows:
readTimeOut = sessionTimeOut * 2 / 3; // here it is not considering the server list. If the server list grows more than 3, it will not giving a fair chance to retry to all the servers(in worst case).
Can we think of changing the 'readTimeOut logic' by using the serverslist.length instead of constant/magic number '3'.
I have 5 servers and client sessionTimeOut=120secs
readTimeOut = 120 * 2 / 3 and is 80secs
In this case, the it takes 80secs for the first timeout if the connected server is not responding. This is large time, if we consdier the serverlist, it can retry to next server immediately in <50secs.
Thanks & Regards,
Camille Fournier 2012-01-03, 00:21
Rakesh R 2012-01-03, 05:36
Benjamin Reed 2012-01-03, 18:04
Patrick Hunt 2012-01-03, 18:55
Thomas Koch 2012-01-03, 14:41