|
|
-
Re: Website vs. FlexJim Klucar 2013-02-28, 14:27
The flex site looked like bootstrap to me, checked the source and sure
enough: <script src="js/jquery.js <view-source:http://flex.apache.org/js/jquery.js>"></script> <script src="js/custom.js <view-source:http://flex.apache.org/js/custom.js>"></script> <script src="js/selectnav.js <view-source:http://flex.apache.org/js/selectnav.js>"></script> <script src="js/flexslider.js <view-source:http://flex.apache.org/js/flexslider.js>"></script> <script src="js/twitter.js <view-source:http://flex.apache.org/js/twitter.js>"></script> <script src="js/fancybox.js <view-source:http://flex.apache.org/js/fancybox.js>"></script> <script src="js/isotope.js <view-source:http://flex.apache.org/js/isotope.js>"></script> <script src="js/bootstrap.js <view-source:http://flex.apache.org/js/bootstrap.js>"></script> What resources are available to us on that website? Any chance of feeding a live monitor from a MiniAccumuloInstance running somewhere or anything like that? On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I mean a little bit of the style and the drop-down. Mainly, the > drop-down, but I like the style, too. I think we should be unique, > though, in terms of style (we want to make the brand distinct and > easily identifiable), but adopt some of the design considerations > (crisp solid colors, distinct borders, minimal 'widgets' and text on > the main view, fewer but bigger buttons to direct users to the most > important information first, shorter more hierarchical menus rather > than long lists, etc.). > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Gabe Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Agreed on the content restructuring, maybe a new theme could speed that > up. > > When you say the menus, do you mean the style or the drop-down function? > > This design could implement drop-downs without JS - > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/265949/AccumuloDropdown.mov (600kb MOV file on > Dropbox) > > On Feb 26, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I like the style, but I think it might require some > >> content-restructuring (esp. the front page). Also, one thing I really > >> liked on the Flex page was the menus. > >> > >> -- > >> Christopher L Tubbs II > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Gabe Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>> Took a stab at it for a bit using styling cues from Twitter bootstrap, > if the community likes it I can create a SVN patch. Also I am an engineer > not a designer so comments/review and subsequently iterations are expected > :). > >>> > >>> (Full disclosure: Dropbox links to PNG files ahead) > >>> > >>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/265949/AccumuloContributors.png > >>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/265949/AccumuloDownloads.png > >>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/265949/AccumuloFeatures.png > >>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/265949/AccumuloHome.png > >>> > >>> On Feb 26, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Has anybody taken a look at the Apache Flex website? > >>>> http://flex.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> [rhetorical] Why isn't our site this beautiful? > >>>> [serious] Who wants to volunteer to make our site this beautiful? > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Christopher L Tubbs II > >>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > >>> > > > |