Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Flume >> mail # user >> "Standard" HTTP logging stack? (0.9.3 => 1.2 Upgrade)


Copy link to this message
-
Re: "Standard" HTTP logging stack? (0.9.3 => 1.2 Upgrade)
It's possible you could use the exec source and tail -F but personally I
would use either the Flume 1.3 RC (until it's released).

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Robert Slifka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Hi Brock,
>
> Thanks for the heads up, wasn't aware that was incoming.
>
> If you don't mind me asking, what's the current recommended approach with
> 1.2?
>
> Rob
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I would use the Spool Directory source in 1.3 to upload the logs files
>> once apache rolls the log.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Robert Slifka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Simple HTTP access.log aggregation case here.  Front ends running Apache
>>> needing to aggregate/sink all access.log data to S3.
>>>
>>> Right now we're on OG 0.9.3:
>>>
>>> nginx => access.log => tailSource => Collector => S3
>>>
>>>
>>> For 1.2, I was under the impression we would simplify and move to:
>>>
>>> Apache => Syslog => Agent…Agent => S3.
>>>
>>>
>>> However it looks like Apache can only Syslog the error.log.  Am I
>>> missing something?
>>>
>>> What's the recommended 'standard' setup?
>>>
>>> Thanks guys,
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce -
>> http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
>>
>
>
--
Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/