Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Extensions for patches accepted by QA bot


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Extensions for patches accepted by QA bot
Alright.
Plan to stick with previous consensus of 3 file extensions.

Cheers
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I don't think that's a necessary filter; it'll still get false-positives
> like HBASE-1234_design_v1.txt. I'd prefer the automation to be kind and
> understanding in accepting and evaluating community contributions :)
> Running failing to apply a non-patch doesn't really hurt anything.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Over in HBASE-10017, the following attachment triggered a QA warning:
> >
> >
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616816/patchSiteOutput.txt
> >
> > Should the acceptance criteria include the notion that there should be
> JIRA
> > number in the filename ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Anoop John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for .patch, .txt, .diff
> > >
> > > -Anoop-
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sounds reasonable to me. Maybe add .diff to that list?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > During review of
> > > > >   HBASE-10044 test-patch.sh should filter out documents by known
> file
> > > > > extensions
> > > > > Jesse made the suggestion that QA bot only accepts files with
> > > extensions
> > > > > .patch
> > > > > and .txt
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to get opinion from the community on this matter.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>