|
|
-
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
lars hofhansl 2012-11-15, 22:41
Sigh... Backport JDK7 *fixes*?
________________________________
From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:39 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 to 0.94?
While trying to fix TestSplitTransactionOnCluster I found that 0.94 I cannot run it at all with JDK7 (it just times out).
In HBase trunk we fixed these and most of the other JDK7 related issues, correct?
Should we backport these fixes to 0.94?
If these changes are not too extensive, I'd vote"yes".
-- Lars
+
lars hofhansl 2012-11-15, 22:41
-
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Jimmy Xiang 2012-11-15, 23:09
+1
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sigh... Backport JDK7 *fixes*?
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:39 PM
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 to 0.94?
>
> While trying to fix TestSplitTransactionOnCluster I found that 0.94 I cannot run it at all with JDK7 (it just times out).
> In HBase trunk we fixed these and most of the other JDK7 related issues, correct?
>
> Should we backport these fixes to 0.94?
>
> If these changes are not too extensive, I'd vote"yes".
>
> -- Lars
+
Jimmy Xiang 2012-11-15, 23:09
-
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
lars hofhansl 2012-11-16, 00:04
Cool. Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this? (I know I could just search, but asking is easier :) )
________________________________
From: Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
+1
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sigh... Backport JDK7 *fixes*?
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:39 PM
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 to 0.94?
>
> While trying to fix TestSplitTransactionOnCluster I found that 0.94 I cannot run it at all with JDK7 (it just times out).
> In HBase trunk we fixed these and most of the other JDK7 related issues, correct?
>
> Should we backport these fixes to 0.94?
>
> If these changes are not too extensive, I'd vote"yes".
>
> -- Lars
+
lars hofhansl 2012-11-16, 00:04
-
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Andrew Purtell 2012-11-16, 00:20
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this?
>
HBASE-5261 could be an umbrella JIRA for JDK7 related work but isn't
currently maintained as one.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-11-16, 00:20
-
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Jimmy Xiang 2012-11-16, 00:23
That's what I know:
HBASE-6182 (HBASE-6181, HBASE-6202, HBASE-6206)
HBASE-7130 (a little trick, need to ignore the pb related stuff)
HBASE-7113
HBASE-6915
HBASE-6917
HBASE-6921
HBASE-6355
Thanks,
Jimmy
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this?
>>
>
> HBASE-5261 could be an umbrella JIRA for JDK7 related work but isn't
> currently maintained as one.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
+
Jimmy Xiang 2012-11-16, 00:23
-
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Andrew Purtell 2012-11-16, 00:29
I linked some stuff to and made some others subtasks of HBASE-5261.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's what I know:
>
> HBASE-6182 (HBASE-6181, HBASE-6202, HBASE-6206)
> HBASE-7130 (a little trick, need to ignore the pb related stuff)
> HBASE-7113
> HBASE-6915
> HBASE-6917
> HBASE-6921
> HBASE-6355
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this?
> >>
> >
> > HBASE-5261 could be an umbrella JIRA for JDK7 related work but isn't
> > currently maintained as one.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-11-16, 00:29
-
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
lars hofhansl 2012-11-16, 00:37
Awesome. Thanks Andy and Jimmy.
I'll try to knock his stuff off for 0.94.4.
-- Lars
________________________________
From: Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
I linked some stuff to and made some others subtasks of HBASE-5261.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's what I know:
>
> HBASE-6182 (HBASE-6181, HBASE-6202, HBASE-6206)
> HBASE-7130 (a little trick, need to ignore the pb related stuff)
> HBASE-7113
> HBASE-6915
> HBASE-6917
> HBASE-6921
> HBASE-6355
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this?
> >>
> >
> > HBASE-5261 could be an umbrella JIRA for JDK7 related work but isn't
> > currently maintained as one.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
+
lars hofhansl 2012-11-16, 00:37
-
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Andrew Purtell 2012-11-16, 00:18
+1
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool. Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this? (I know I
> could just search, but asking is easier :) )
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 3:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Sigh... Backport JDK7 *fixes*?
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:39 PM
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 to 0.94?
> >
> > While trying to fix TestSplitTransactionOnCluster I found that 0.94 I
> cannot run it at all with JDK7 (it just times out).
> > In HBase trunk we fixed these and most of the other JDK7 related issues,
> correct?
> >
> > Should we backport these fixes to 0.94?
> >
> > If these changes are not too extensive, I'd vote"yes".
> >
> > -- Lars
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-11-16, 00:18
|
|
