This is the first candidate release for Apache BookKeeper, version
4.0.0.

It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311293&version=12317843

*** Please download, test and vote by December 7th 2011, 08:00 GMT.

Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
for convenience.

Source and binary files:
http://people.apache.org/~ivank/bookkeeper-4.0.0-candidate-0/

Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-285/

The tag to be voted upon:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.0.0/

BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.0.0/KEYS

Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.

-1, overall looks very close, feedback below:

0) don't call the vote on user lists, this is a development activity.
Just on the bk dev and private list (only ZK PMC votes are binding).
Include zk dev if you like. When the entire process is finished ff to
publish to all these lists as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

also, you only need to allow 72hours for the vote.

1) signature/checksums look good.

2) move the keys file into
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist - similar
to what zk does. This shouldn't be in your source repo.

not a blocker issue but you should add yourself to the web of trust asap.

3) the NOTICE.txt is unacceptable.

This needs to be the Apache boilerplate, plus any third party
dependencies you might have (are you shipping any third party
dependencies that require notification? afaict no.), see
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
specifically the section "NOTICE file"

4) readme looks good

5) mvn test passed

6) licensing -- RAT looks good.

Cleanup these small issues then call a new vote on a second RC and you
should be good.

Patrick

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Ivan Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the first candidate release for Apache BookKeeper, version
> 4.0.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311293&version=12317843
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by December 7th 2011, 08:00 GMT.
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> for convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~ivank/bookkeeper-4.0.0-candidate-0/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-285/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.0.0/
>
> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.0.0/KEYS
>
> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
> and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.

This is the second candidate release for Apache BookKeeper, version
4.0.0.

It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311293&version=12317843

*** Please download, test and vote by December 5th 2011, 21:00 GMT.

Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
for convenience.

Source and binary files:
http://people.apache.org/~ivank/bookkeeper-4.0.0-candidate-1/

Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-287/

The tag to be voted upon:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.0.0/

BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS

Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.

+1 this looks great ivan! excellent work.

i do have one question for pat. in the binary tar files do we have to
put in something special for the licenses of the included binaries?

ben

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Ivan Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the second candidate release for Apache BookKeeper, version
> 4.0.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311293&version=12317843
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by December 5th 2011, 21:00 GMT.
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> for convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~ivank/bookkeeper-4.0.0-candidate-1/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-287/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.0.0/
>
> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>
> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
> and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.

Yes. See this section:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license

I'm not sure if this changed btw when Hadoop/ZK started and current
documentation, notice that it says to include in the license file.
What hadoop/zk do is to include individual license files in the "lib"
directory, along side the jars themselves. We probably should change
this in zk to be in compliance.

Patrick

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 this looks great ivan! excellent work.
>
> i do have one question for pat. in the binary tar files do we have to
> put in something special for the licenses of the included binaries?
>
> ben
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Ivan Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is the second candidate release for Apache BookKeeper, version
>> 4.0.0.
>>
>> It fixes the following issues:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311293&version=12317843
>>
>> *** Please download, test and vote by December 5th 2011, 21:00 GMT.
>>
>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>> for convenience.
>>
>> Source and binary files:
>> http://people.apache.org/~ivank/bookkeeper-4.0.0-candidate-1/
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-287/
>>
>> The tag to be voted upon:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.0.0/
>>
>> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
>> and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.

+1, the sig/checksums look good, RAT is ok and the notice seems
correct. Great job!

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Ivan Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the second candidate release for Apache BookKeeper, version
> 4.0.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311293&version=12317843
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by December 5th 2011, 21:00 GMT.
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> for convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~ivank/bookkeeper-4.0.0-candidate-1/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-287/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.0.0/
>
> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>
> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
> and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.

I've updated the binary packages to include licenses for all included
jars. Attached for convenience.

> I'm not sure if this changed btw when Hadoop/ZK started and current
> documentation, notice that it says to include in the license file.
> What hadoop/zk do is to include individual license files in the "lib"
> directory, along side the jars themselves. We probably should change
> this in zk to be in compliance.
Individual license files will probably be hard to do in maven, as the
lib directory will not exist in the source.

-Ivan

+1, I have run unit tests, some manual tests, and gone through the  
release checklist.

-Flavio

On Dec 5, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:

> +1, the sig/checksums look good, RAT is ok and the notice seems
> correct. Great job!
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Ivan Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is the second candidate release for Apache BookKeeper, version
>> 4.0.0.
>>
>> It fixes the following issues:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311293&version=12317843
>>
>> *** Please download, test and vote by December 5th 2011, 21:00 GMT.
>>
>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>> for convenience.
>>
>> Source and binary files:
>> http://people.apache.org/~ivank/bookkeeper-4.0.0-candidate-1/
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-287/
>>
>> The tag to be voted upon:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.0.0/
>>
>> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the  
>> release:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to  
>> build
>> and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.

flavio
junqueira

research scientist

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct +34 93-183-8828

avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300    fax (408) 349 3301

I'm confused now. If you change the candidate files, then we have to  
call for a new vote, no?

-Flavio

On Dec 6, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:

> I've updated the binary packages to include licenses for all included
> jars. Attached for convenience.
>
>> I'm not sure if this changed btw when Hadoop/ZK started and current
>> documentation, notice that it says to include in the license file.
>> What hadoop/zk do is to include individual license files in the "lib"
>> directory, along side the jars themselves. We probably should change
>> this in zk to be in compliance.
> Individual license files will probably be hard to do in maven, as the
> lib directory will not exist in the source.
>
> -Ivan

flavio
junqueira

research scientist

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct +34 93-183-8828

avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300    fax (408) 349 3301

I missed initially that the changes are only to the binary packages.  
It doesn't sound like we need to call a new vote.

-Flavio

On Dec 6, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:

> I'm confused now. If you change the candidate files, then we have to
> call for a new vote, no?
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Dec 6, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
>
>> I've updated the binary packages to include licenses for all included
>> jars. Attached for convenience.
>>
>>> I'm not sure if this changed btw when Hadoop/ZK started and current
>>> documentation, notice that it says to include in the license file.
>>> What hadoop/zk do is to include individual license files in the  
>>> "lib"
>>> directory, along side the jars themselves. We probably should change
>>> this in zk to be in compliance.
>> Individual license files will probably be hard to do in maven, as the
>> lib directory will not exist in the source.
>>
>> -Ivan
>
> flavio
> junqueira
>
> research scientist
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
> phone (408) 349 3300    fax (408) 349 3301
>

flavio
junqueira

research scientist

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct +34 93-183-8828

avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300    fax (408) 349 3301

I forgot to attach the files. Attached now

-Ivan

On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:49:33AM +0100, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> I've updated the binary packages to include licenses for all included
> jars. Attached for convenience.
>
> > I'm not sure if this changed btw when Hadoop/ZK started and current
> > documentation, notice that it says to include in the license file.
> > What hadoop/zk do is to include individual license files in the "lib"
> > directory, along side the jars themselves. We probably should change
> > this in zk to be in compliance.
> Individual license files will probably be hard to do in maven, as the
> lib directory will not exist in the source.
>
> -Ivan

The vote has passed with three binding +1 from phunt, breed & fpj.

I'll push out the list to dist and maven. Once the mirrors have
synced, I'll update the website and send out an announcement.

Thanks for taking a look guys,
-Ivan

On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:13:48PM +0100, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> This is the second candidate release for Apache BookKeeper, version
> 4.0.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311293&version=12317843
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by December 5th 2011, 21:00 GMT.
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
> for convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~ivank/bookkeeper-4.0.0-candidate-1/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-287/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/tags/release-4.0.0/
>
> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/bookkeeper/dist/KEYS
>
> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
> and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.