On 04/29/2011 04:09 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
This does not appear to include the 0.20-append work? So it's not
advisable to use HBase with this revision, correct?
The patch selection process for this branch did not appear to be a
community process. A massive patch set was committed en-masse with no
public discussion before or after about its specific composition.
Long-term the users of a project benefit from a community that
collaborates using open, interactive processes. If a particular set of
patches, not created through such a process, is valuable to end users,
then it can be distributed on github or elsewhere under a different
name, but should not be granted the imprimatur of a community product.