|
|
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 0)
Russell Jurney 2013-02-11, 03:05
Been using 0.11 a month. Works great! Running tests overnight. On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup> > Please download, test, and try it out: > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/> > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday EOD, Feb 15th. > > Thanks, > Bill > -- Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] datasyndrome.com
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 0)
Alan Gates 2013-02-11, 21:23
+1 Ran a few smoke tests in both local and cluster modes, compiled and ran the unit tests on the source, tested piggybank and the tutorial, looked over the NOTICE, LICENSE, and RELEASE_NOTES files. We should update the RELEASE_NOTES to say we've tested this version with Hadoop 1.0 (instead of 0.18), but that isn't a blocker for the release. Alan. On Feb 9, 2013, at 11:05 PM, Bill Graham wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup> > Please download, test, and try it out: > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/> > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday EOD, Feb 15th. > > Thanks, > Bill
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 0)
Bill Graham 2013-02-12, 04:27
Ugh. I had updated the release notes file with a note about that along with notes about what's contained in the release. My updates made it here, but not into the artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/RELEASE_NOTES.txtLet me roll another RC. We should have the proper notes in there. On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Ran a few smoke tests in both local and cluster modes, compiled and ran > the unit tests on the source, tested piggybank and the tutorial, looked > over the NOTICE, LICENSE, and RELEASE_NOTES files. We should update the > RELEASE_NOTES to say we've tested this version with Hadoop 1.0 (instead of > 0.18), but that isn't a blocker for the release. > > Alan. > > On Feb 9, 2013, at 11:05 PM, Bill Graham wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. > > > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup> > > > Please download, test, and try it out: > > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/> > > > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday EOD, Feb 15th. > > > > Thanks, > > Bill > > -- *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] going forward.*
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 0)
Russell Jurney 2013-02-12, 15:55
BUILD FAILED /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:941: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:863: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:936: Tests failed! Total time: 768 minutes 27 seconds On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ugh. I had updated the release notes file with a note about that along with > notes about what's contained in the release. My updates made it here, but > not into the artifacts: > > > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/RELEASE_NOTES.txt> > Let me roll another RC. We should have the proper notes in there. > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Ran a few smoke tests in both local and cluster modes, compiled and ran > > the unit tests on the source, tested piggybank and the tutorial, looked > > over the NOTICE, LICENSE, and RELEASE_NOTES files. We should update the > > RELEASE_NOTES to say we've tested this version with Hadoop 1.0 (instead > of > > 0.18), but that isn't a blocker for the release. > > > > Alan. > > > > On Feb 9, 2013, at 11:05 PM, Bill Graham wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. > > > > > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup> > > > > > Please download, test, and try it out: > > > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/> > > > > > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday EOD, Feb 15th. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Bill > > > > > > > -- > *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] going forward.* > -- Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] datasyndrome.com
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 0)
Bill Graham 2013-02-12, 17:18
The artifacts don't expand to a pig-trunk/ directory, so is this the release candidate? If so, which ant command did you run and which tests failed? On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Russell Jurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > BUILD FAILED > /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:941: The following error > occurred while executing this line: > /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:863: The following error > occurred while executing this line: > /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:936: Tests failed! > > Total time: 768 minutes 27 seconds > > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Ugh. I had updated the release notes file with a note about that along >> with >> notes about what's contained in the release. My updates made it here, but >> not into the artifacts: >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/RELEASE_NOTES.txt>> >> Let me roll another RC. We should have the proper notes in there. >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > Ran a few smoke tests in both local and cluster modes, compiled and ran >> > the unit tests on the source, tested piggybank and the tutorial, looked >> > over the NOTICE, LICENSE, and RELEASE_NOTES files. We should update the >> > RELEASE_NOTES to say we've tested this version with Hadoop 1.0 (instead >> of >> > 0.18), but that isn't a blocker for the release. >> > >> > Alan. >> > >> > On Feb 9, 2013, at 11:05 PM, Bill Graham wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. >> > > >> > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: >> > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup>> > > >> > > Please download, test, and try it out: >> > > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/>> > > >> > > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday EOD, Feb 15th. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Bill >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] going forward.* >> > > > > -- > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] datasyndrome. > com > -- *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] going forward.*
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 0)
Russell Jurney 2013-02-12, 17:28
This is ... branch-0.11 latest. I can't see that any tests actually fail. Strange. On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The artifacts don't expand to a pig-trunk/ directory, so is this the > release candidate? > > If so, which ant command did you run and which tests failed? > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Russell Jurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> BUILD FAILED >> /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:941: The following error >> occurred while executing this line: >> /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:863: The following error >> occurred while executing this line: >> /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:936: Tests failed! >> >> Total time: 768 minutes 27 seconds >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> Ugh. I had updated the release notes file with a note about that along >>> with >>> notes about what's contained in the release. My updates made it here, but >>> not into the artifacts: >>> >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/RELEASE_NOTES.txt>>> >>> Let me roll another RC. We should have the proper notes in there. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > Ran a few smoke tests in both local and cluster modes, compiled and ran >>> > the unit tests on the source, tested piggybank and the tutorial, looked >>> > over the NOTICE, LICENSE, and RELEASE_NOTES files. We should update >>> the >>> > RELEASE_NOTES to say we've tested this version with Hadoop 1.0 >>> (instead of >>> > 0.18), but that isn't a blocker for the release. >>> > >>> > Alan. >>> > >>> > On Feb 9, 2013, at 11:05 PM, Bill Graham wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. >>> > > >>> > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: >>> > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup>>> > > >>> > > Please download, test, and try it out: >>> > > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/>>> > > >>> > > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday EOD, Feb 15th. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > Bill >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me >>> at >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] going forward.* >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] datasyndrome. >> com >> > > > > -- > *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me > at [EMAIL PROTECTED] going forward.* > -- Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] datasyndrome.com
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 1)
Alan Gates 2013-02-12, 19:19
+1 Release notes look good. Built the code and tests, including piggybank and docs. Ran the piggybank tests and all the tutorials. Ran simple smoke tests in local and cluster mode. Alan. On Feb 11, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Bill Graham wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup> > Please download, test, and try it out: > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-1/<http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/>> > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Sunday EOD, Feb 17th. > > Thanks, > Bill
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 0)
Bill Graham 2013-02-13, 05:06
Is there evidence of failures or errors in the first few lines of any of the logs/TEST-org.apache.pig.test.*.txt files? On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Russell Jurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > This is ... branch-0.11 latest. I can't see that any tests actually fail. > Strange. > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The artifacts don't expand to a pig-trunk/ directory, so is this the >> release candidate? >> >> If so, which ant command did you run and which tests failed? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Russell Jurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > wrote: >> >>> BUILD FAILED >>> /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:941: The following error >>> occurred while executing this line: >>> /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:863: The following error >>> occurred while executing this line: >>> /Users/rjurney/Software/pig-trunk/build.xml:936: Tests failed! >>> >>> Total time: 768 minutes 27 seconds >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >>> >>>> Ugh. I had updated the release notes file with a note about that along >>>> with >>>> notes about what's contained in the release. My updates made it here, >>>> but >>>> not into the artifacts: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/RELEASE_NOTES.txt>>>> >>>> Let me roll another RC. We should have the proper notes in there. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > +1 >>>> > >>>> > Ran a few smoke tests in both local and cluster modes, compiled and >>>> ran >>>> > the unit tests on the source, tested piggybank and the tutorial, >>>> looked >>>> > over the NOTICE, LICENSE, and RELEASE_NOTES files. We should update >>>> the >>>> > RELEASE_NOTES to say we've tested this version with Hadoop 1.0 >>>> (instead of >>>> > 0.18), but that isn't a blocker for the release. >>>> > >>>> > Alan. >>>> > >>>> > On Feb 9, 2013, at 11:05 PM, Bill Graham wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > Hi, >>>> > > >>>> > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. >>>> > > >>>> > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: >>>> > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup>>>> > > >>>> > > Please download, test, and try it out: >>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/>>>> > > >>>> > > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday EOD, Feb 15th. >>>> > > >>>> > > Thanks, >>>> > > Bill >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me >>>> at >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] going forward.* >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] datasyndrome >>> .com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me >> at [EMAIL PROTECTED] going forward.* >> > > > > -- > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] datasyndrome. > com > -- *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] going forward.*
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 1)
Daniel Dai 2013-02-14, 19:52
Hi, Bill, The tarball/rpm/deb does not bundle piggybank.jar. We shall build piggybank.jar before we wrapping the package. Also in release notes, we have "This currently only works with Java 1.6.x.", I think this should not be the case. I also checked build, rpm/deb installation, tutorial, contrib build, all others looks good. Thanks, Daniel On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Release notes look good. Built the code and tests, including piggybank and docs. Ran the piggybank tests and all the tutorials. Ran simple smoke tests in local and cluster mode. > > Alan. > > On Feb 11, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Bill Graham wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. >> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup>> >> Please download, test, and try it out: >> http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-1/<http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/>>> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Sunday EOD, Feb 17th. >> >> Thanks, >> Bill >
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 1)
Bill Graham 2013-02-14, 20:46
Thanks Daniel, good catch. I'll roll a new RC. Filed this Pig 12 jira re the artifacts not containing piggybank: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3186On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Bill, > The tarball/rpm/deb does not bundle piggybank.jar. We shall build > piggybank.jar before we wrapping the package. Also in release notes, > we have "This currently only works with Java 1.6.x.", I think this > should not be the case. > > I also checked build, rpm/deb installation, tutorial, contrib build, > all others looks good. > > Thanks, > Daniel > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > +1 > > > > Release notes look good. Built the code and tests, including piggybank > and docs. Ran the piggybank tests and all the tutorials. Ran simple smoke > tests in local and cluster mode. > > > > Alan. > > > > On Feb 11, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Bill Graham wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. > >> > >> Keys used to sign the release are available at: > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup> >> > >> Please download, test, and try it out: > >> http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-1/<> http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-0/>> >> > >> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Sunday EOD, Feb 17th. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Bill > > > -- *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] going forward.*
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 2)
Daniel Dai 2013-02-19, 22:12
+1. Checked piggybank.jar in tarball/rpm/deb, checked release notes, all looks good this time. Daniel On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup> > Please download, test, and try it out: > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-2/> > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Feb 20th. > > Thanks, > Bill
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 2)
Dmitriy Ryaboy 2013-02-20, 21:31
+1 tests pass. ran sample jobs in local mode and on cluster. Verified HBaseStorage still works. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1. Checked piggybank.jar in tarball/rpm/deb, checked release notes, > all looks good this time. > > Daniel > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. > > > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup> > > > Please download, test, and try it out: > > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-2/> > > > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Feb 20th. > > > > Thanks, > > Bill >
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 2)
Julien Le Dem 2013-02-21, 01:10
+1 I've run a subset of the tests on the src tar run some jobs in local mode on the binary tar checked the release note looks good to me Julien On Feb 14, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Bill Graham wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup> > Please download, test, and try it out: > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-2/> > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Feb 20th. > > Thanks, > Bill
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 2)
Cheolsoo Park 2013-02-21, 03:46
+1 (non-binding) I downloaded and compiled source tarball. I tested jars against Hadoop 1.x and 2.x based clusters. On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Julien Le Dem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > I've run a subset of the tests on the src tar > run some jobs in local mode on the binary tar > checked the release note > looks good to me > Julien > > On Feb 14, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Bill Graham wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. > > > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup> > > > Please download, test, and try it out: > > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-2/> > > > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Feb 20th. > > > > Thanks, > > Bill > >
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.11.0 (candidate 2)
Bill Graham 2013-02-21, 07:53
With 3 binding +1s (Daniel, Dmitriy and Julien) and 1 non-binding +1 (Cheolsoo), the vote passes. I will start the release process. thanks, Bill On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Cheolsoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I downloaded and compiled source tarball. I tested jars against Hadoop 1.x > and 2.x based clusters. > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Julien Le Dem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > I've run a subset of the tests on the src tar > > run some jobs in local mode on the binary tar > > checked the release note > > looks good to me > > Julien > > > > On Feb 14, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Bill Graham wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.0. > > > > > > Keys used to sign the release are available at: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup> > > > > > Please download, test, and try it out: > > > http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.0-candidate-2/> > > > > > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Feb 20th. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Bill > > > > >
|
|