Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Zookeeper >> mail # dev >> Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)


+
Hanno Schlichting 2012-10-02, 15:20
+
Michi Mutsuzaki 2012-10-02, 19:35
+
Stack 2012-10-02, 05:40
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-04, 06:34
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-04, 23:13
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-04, 23:10
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-04, 23:15
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-05, 00:04
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 00:07
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 06:17
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 16:56
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 03:55
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 03:58
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
the same time... bam.

I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
that should help.

Patrick

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at the
> same time:
>
> Building remotely on ubuntu4
> <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>
> We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
> parallel.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/):
>>
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>       at org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>>       at org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>       at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>>       at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>>       at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>>       at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>>       at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>>       at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>>       at org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>>       at org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>>       at org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>>       at org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>> >
>>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>>> >         at
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>>> >         at
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Patrick
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Good point Ted.
>>> >> Eugene,
>>> >>  Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>>> level? :)
>>> >>
>>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>> >>
>>> >> thanks
>>> >> mahadev
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root
>>> cause ?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
>>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
>>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
>>> >>>> working.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Patrick
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>> > Hi all,
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >   I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
>>> >>>> >  addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 14:16
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 21:25
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-07, 13:56
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-07, 15:34
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 05:17
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 16:05
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 23:17
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-08, 05:05
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 05:19
+
Flavio Junqueira 2012-10-10, 16:04
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-11, 05:38
+
Alexander Shraer 2012-10-11, 21:42
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-11, 21:45
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-12, 20:12
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-12, 20:28
+
Alexander Shraer 2012-10-11, 21:47
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 17:39
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-11-05, 08:20
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB