Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> [VOTE] The 6th hbase-0.96.0 release candidate is available for download


+
Stack 2013-10-11, 23:20
+
Devaraj Das 2013-10-16, 01:25
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-10-16, 02:14
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] The 6th hbase-0.96.0 release candidate is available for download
Is anybody else testing the RC? It has been 6 days since the cut.

Apart from HBASE-9775, are there more concerns? Elliot / Nicolas, any
update on the test?

Enis
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Spent the day testing the RC. Here is my +1 based on:
>
>  - Downloaded artifacts for -hadoop1-bin -hadoop2-bin and -src
>  - Verified checksums for the artifacts (except for RMD160)
>    Note: It would be useful if we can get these in a machine readable
> format to do automated verification with {sha*|md5}sum -c (for the next
> time)
>  - Verified signatures
>  - Checked out documentation
>  - Checked out layouts for artifacts
>  - Verified hadoop versions
>  - Run local cluster
>  - Build source artifact with hadoop1 and hadoop2
>  - Run small unit tests
>  - Deployed on a 7 node cluster with hadoop-2
>  - Run small tests including LoadTestTool, ITBigLinkedList,
> ITLoadAndVerify and some shell smoke tests
>
> Plus we have been running the tip of 0.96 branch through our test harness
> including many IT's with and without CM configurations.
>
> Let's ship it !
>
> Enis
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Devaraj Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1. Based on some large scale tests with bits very close to RC5. Found two
>> issues - HBASE-9773 and HBASE-9777 and neither of them are release
>> blockers
>> in my mind.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > hbase-0.96.0 will be our next major release.  It is intended to supplant
>> > the 0.94.x series.
>> >
>> > hbase-0.96.0RC5 is our sixth hbase-0.96.0 release candidate.
>> >
>> > The signed tarballs are available here:
>> >
>> >  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.96.0RC5<
>> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/0.96.0RC5/>
>> > / <http://people.apache.org/~stack/0.96.0RC5/>
>> >
>> > Note that hbase-0.96.0 comes in two flavors; a build that includes and
>> runs
>> > on hadoop-1.x and another for hadoop-2.x.  You must chose the hbase that
>> > suits your hadoop context.
>> >
>> > Both sets of hbase artifacts, for hadoop1 and for hadoop2, are
>> available in
>> > this maven staging repo:
>> >
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-165/
>> >
>> > More than 2k issues [1][2][3][4] are attributed to this version
>> (counting
>> > fixes done against this and the 0.95.x developer series of releases).
>>  More
>> > than 250 fixes have been committed since 0.95.2.  Synopsis of the main
>> > changes between 0.94.x and 0.96.x will follow soon.
>> >
>> > Please take it for a spin.  We are interested in any issues found but in
>> > particular, we would appreciate feedback on how well the migration of a
>> > 0.94.x dataset to run under 0.96.0 works [5].
>> >
>> > Should this candidate become hbase-0.96.0?  Please vote +/-1 by Friday,
>> > October 18th.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > St.Ack
>> >
>> > 1. 0.96.0 266 issues http://goo.gl/wLmu1Y
>> > 2. 0.95.2 340 issues http://goo.gl/4djjE9
>> > 3. 0.95.1 265 issues http://goo.gl/TcdckW
>> > 4. 0.95.0 1263 issues http://goo.gl/Iqcx2i
>> > 2. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade0.96
>> >
>>
>> --
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
>> to
>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> that
>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>> immediately
>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>
>
>
+
Ted Yu 2013-10-17, 21:49
+
Elliott Clark 2013-10-18, 19:37
+
Nicolas Liochon 2013-10-18, 21:06
+
Stack 2013-10-17, 21:31
+
Stack 2013-10-18, 21:43
+
Stack 2013-10-19, 03:33
+
Dave Wang 2013-10-19, 04:19
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-10-20, 19:01