Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Zookeeper >> mail # user >> Windows support (Win-64)


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Windows support (Win-64)
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Salabhanjika S
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Back from long vacation today. I'll take a look at windows build/test failures.
>
> Also, how about having a parent JIRA to have all outstanding issues on
> Windows as sub-tasks of it?

Take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1833

Patrick

>
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:25 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ah, no, I think that's just ZookeeperNet which I'm already using (but I have the issues forcing session expiry as I mentioned in another mail). Apart from that issue it seems really solid though, so I'll probably stick with that for now.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Young, Ben
>> Sent: 16 January 2014 08:53
>> To: UserZooKeeper
>> Subject: RE: Windows support (Win-64)
>>
>> I haven't! I'll take a look, thanks.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: 15 January 2014 19:41
>> To: UserZooKeeper
>> Subject: Re: Windows support (Win-64)
>>
>> You've seen Sharpkeeper?
>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/ZKClientBindings
>> http://zookeeper-user.578899.n2.nabble.com/Info-How-to-build-Sharpkeeper-td6539672.html
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:44 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Will do! We're interested in using it from .NET, but the primary point
>>> is to get the server supported, and then we can choose our method of
>>> access from .NET (e.g. wrap the C client or use the ZookeeperNet
>>> package etc)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ben
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>> Sent: 10 January 2014 21:11
>>> To: UserZooKeeper
>>> Subject: Re: Windows support (Win-64)
>>>
>>> Just back from vacation and didn't notice a number of folks are looking at this:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1833
>>>
>>> Kudos!
>>>
>>> Ben feel free to jump in and participate.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Ben, if you were interested to help drive windows support that
>>>> would be great. I'd be happy to help support. Note that Michi has
>>>> been doing work on this already, you probably have seen that on the
>>>> ML archive and the JIRA. I suggest you look there if you want to get
>>>> more insight into activity/progress.
>>>>
>>>> In terms of what you might do, take a look a our CI env
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/
>>>> notice that we have three builds running on windows, some with vs2008
>>>>
>>>> Likely you'd want to run the same but in your environment, probably
>>>> on
>>>> 3.4.5 release
>>>>
>>>> It would be great if you could enter JIRAs/patches for the things you
>>>> find. If you're "comfortable" at some point then I don't see why we
>>>> couldn't update the docs and make it official in an upcoming release.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:24 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> We would certain be interested in helping giving feedback on the server stability on Windows. I'm trying to push for increased adoption of Zookeeper in the org, but the message in the docs itself puts off my managers a bit from pushing full ahead, so it's a bit of a chicken and egg situation. If there are test suites we can run to help you out I can look at running them here on Windows...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Ben
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>>> Sent: 09 January 2014 22:40
>>>>> To: UserZooKeeper
>>>>> Subject: Re: Windows support (Win-64)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Salabhanjika S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> afaik there is no reason it should work on windows.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick, I got more confused by your statement. Did you mean "no
>>>>>> reason it should *NOT* to work on Windows"? I will be very happy if
>>>>>> that is what you meant.
>>>>>
>>