-Re: code review: HBASE-5231 Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load balancing) to 0.92
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made Fix Version of HBASE-5231 0.92.1
> I can wait till 0.92.0 is released.
IMO we should push it to 0.94.0. Point releases should be for minor
improvements and bug fixes. The fact that we divert so much energy
into past releases is part of why we're so slow to release the new
ones -- and the long period between the new releases I think
contributes to how unstable trunk gets in the meantime. I won't -1 it
for 0.92.1, but it just seems like a Bad Idea.
/me goes back to beating the 'we should do time-based releases' drum
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can we please wait until 0.92 is released before we talk about putting
>> more stuff in there? This release process has dragged on for months
>> because we can't seem to say "no".
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > The person sitting next to me at the HBase meetup tonight told me that
>> > once thought of allocating one cluster per table - just to keep regions
>> > each table balanced.
>> > With HBASE-5231, you don't have to do that anymore.
>> > Please review the patch.
>> > Thanks
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
Software Engineer, Cloudera