Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo, mail # dev - 1.6 discussion


Copy link to this message
-
Re: 1.6 discussion
Christopher 2013-06-05, 16:04
At 1430EDT, right?

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Billie Rinaldi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's try this:
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/c96631ed67e4add15f0f84ab8ae65ac4aaef6204
>
> Billie
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> How would I attend this -- is here a link I can go to?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Jon.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > June 5 makes more sense ;)
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > --
>> > Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Wednesday, June 5. 1430 EDT, correct?
>> > >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> It is past 1430 EDT on Wednesday. Is this ongoing?
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Adam Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > >> > I second 1430 EDT on Wednesday.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Adam
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Billie Rinaldi <
>> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> I can't do it then.  I counter-propose Wednesday at 1430 ET.
>>  Two-ish
>> > >> hours
>> > >> >> sounds reasonable.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Billie
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Adam Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> > A hangout is best for me too, but we will have to make sure we
>> have
>> > >> >> enough
>> > >> >> > capacity for everyone who is interested. Let's pick a date first
>> > and
>> > >> see
>> > >> >> > how many people will be joining us. I propose Wednesday
>> afternoon,
>> > >> >> starting
>> > >> >> > at 1300 EDT and going approximately two hours (or until we're
>> > done).
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Adam
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > > I vote google hangout also.
>> > >> >> > > On May 28, 2013 4:21 PM, "Christopher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > > Google Hangout works for me.
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > --
>> > >> >> > > > Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > >> >> > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:51 PM, John Vines <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >> > > > > I'm a fan of using google hangouts because then the session
>> > >> could
>> > >> >> be
>> > >> >> > > > > recorded and thrown up on youtube as reference.
>> > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:44 PM, David Medinets <
>> > >> >> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > >> Where? Is there a central location to people?
>> > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> >> > > > >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Adam Fuchs <
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> > > wrote:
>> > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> >> > > > >> > I'm interested. Tuesday's no good for me, but my other
>> > days
>> > >> are
>> > >> >> > > fairly
>> > >> >> > > > >> > flexible.
>> > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> >> > > > >> > Adam
>> > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> >> > > > >> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Billie Rinaldi
>> > >> >> > > > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> >> > > > >> > > Would anyone be interested in getting together next
>> > week in
>> > >> >> > person
>> > >> >> > > > or
>> > >> >> > > > >> via
>> > >> >> > > > >> > > hangout to discuss 1.6 features?
>> > >> >> > > > >> > >
>> > >> >> > > > >> > > If we have such a discussion, decisions will not be
>> made
>> > >> and
>> > >> >> > notes
>> > >> >> > > > will