Olga Natkovich
2009-03-17, 22:21
Olga Natkovich
2009-03-17, 22:26
Olga Natkovich
2009-03-17, 22:37
Santhosh Srinivasan
2009-03-17, 22:44
Olga Natkovich
2009-03-17, 23:04
Nigel Daley
2009-03-18, 00:49
Olga Natkovich
2009-03-18, 01:03
Alan Gates
2009-03-20, 17:55
Santhosh Srinivasan
2009-03-20, 18:54
Nigel Daley
2009-03-20, 20:40
Santhosh Srinivasan
2009-03-20, 20:51
Nigel Daley
2009-03-21, 22:32
Santhosh Srinivasan
2009-03-22, 23:04
Alan Gates
2009-03-23, 20:26
Nigel Daley
2009-03-23, 20:30
Olga Natkovich
2009-03-23, 20:34
Olga Natkovich
2009-03-23, 20:35
Pradeep Kamath
2009-03-23, 20:42
Nigel Daley
2009-03-23, 20:52
Olga Natkovich
2009-03-23, 20:57
-
[VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Olga Natkovich 2009-03-17, 22:21
Pig Committers,
I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down. It
also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.
The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.
Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
Please download, test, and try it out:
http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
Olga
I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down. It
also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.
The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.
Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
Please download, test, and try it out:
http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
Olga
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Olga Natkovich 2009-03-17, 22:26
And now with attached report.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
> greatly improved system performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
> files listed as being without a license header. All these
> files are generated by javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
>
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
> greatly improved system performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
> files listed as being without a license header. All these
> files are generated by javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
>
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Olga Natkovich 2009-03-17, 22:37
Hmm, does not look like the attachment made it through again. One more
try.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
> greatly improved system performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
> files listed as being without a license header. All these
> files are generated by javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
>
try.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
> greatly improved system performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
> files listed as being without a license header. All these
> files are generated by javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
>
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Santhosh Srinivasan 2009-03-17, 22:44
I am attaching the report with this reply. Hopefully, we should see it.
Thanks,
Santhosh
-----Original Message-----
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Hmm, does not look like the attachment made it through again. One more
try.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
> greatly improved system performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
> files listed as being without a license header. All these
> files are generated by javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
>
Thanks,
Santhosh
-----Original Message-----
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Hmm, does not look like the attachment made it through again. One more
try.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
> greatly improved system performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
> files listed as being without a license header. All these
> files are generated by javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
>
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Olga Natkovich 2009-03-17, 23:04
Can't get the attachment in. Mail server must be on strike. Relevant
portion is inlined below.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
> greatly improved system performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
> files listed as being without a license header. All these
> files are generated by javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
>
[java]
[java] *****************************************************
[java] Summary
[java] -------
[java] Notes: 6
[java] Binaries: 101
[java] Archives: 10
[java] Standards: 1712
[java]
[java] Apache Licensed: 470
[java] Generated Documents: 1160
[java]
[java] JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
[java] Generated files do not required license headers
[java]
[java] 82 Unknown Licenses
[java]
[java] *******************************
[java]
[java] Archives (+ indicates readable, $ unreadable):
[java]
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/pig-1.0.0-dev-
core.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/hadoop17.j
ar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/hadoop18.j
ar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/hbase-0.18
.1-test.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/hbase-0.18
.1.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/javacc.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/jline-0.9.
94.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/jsch-0.1.3
3.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/junit-4.1.
jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/rats.jar
[java]
[java] *****************************************************
[java] Files with AL headers will be marked L
[java] Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be
marked B
[java] Compressed archives will be marked A
[java] Notices, licenses etc will be marked N
[java] AL
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/CHANGES.txt
[java] N
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/LICENSE.txt
[java] N
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/NOTICE.txt
[java] N
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/README.txt
[java] AL
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/build.xml
[java] A
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/pig-1.0.0-dev-
core.jar
[java] AL
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/bin/pig
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/broken-li
nks.xml
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/cookbook.
html
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/cookbook.
pdf
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/index.htm
l
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/index.pdf
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/linkmap.h
tml
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/linkmap.p
df
[java] AL
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/locationm
ap.xml
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/piglatin.
html
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/piglatin.
pdf
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/quickstar
t.html
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/quickstar
t.pdf
[java] AL
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/test1.htm
l
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/tutorial.
html
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/tutorial.
pdf
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/udf.html
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/udf.pdf
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/allcl
asses-frame.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/allcl
asses-noframe.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/const
ant-values.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/depre
cated-list.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/help-
doc.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/index
-all.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/index
.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/overv
iew-frame.html
[jav
portion is inlined below.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
> greatly improved system performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
> files listed as being without a license header. All these
> files are generated by javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
>
[java]
[java] *****************************************************
[java] Summary
[java] -------
[java] Notes: 6
[java] Binaries: 101
[java] Archives: 10
[java] Standards: 1712
[java]
[java] Apache Licensed: 470
[java] Generated Documents: 1160
[java]
[java] JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
[java] Generated files do not required license headers
[java]
[java] 82 Unknown Licenses
[java]
[java] *******************************
[java]
[java] Archives (+ indicates readable, $ unreadable):
[java]
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/pig-1.0.0-dev-
core.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/hadoop17.j
ar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/hadoop18.j
ar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/hbase-0.18
.1-test.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/hbase-0.18
.1.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/javacc.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/jline-0.9.
94.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/jsch-0.1.3
3.jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/junit-4.1.
jar
[java] +
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/rats.jar
[java]
[java] *****************************************************
[java] Files with AL headers will be marked L
[java] Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be
marked B
[java] Compressed archives will be marked A
[java] Notices, licenses etc will be marked N
[java] AL
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/CHANGES.txt
[java] N
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/LICENSE.txt
[java] N
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/NOTICE.txt
[java] N
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/README.txt
[java] AL
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/build.xml
[java] A
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/pig-1.0.0-dev-
core.jar
[java] AL
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/bin/pig
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/broken-li
nks.xml
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/cookbook.
html
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/cookbook.
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/index.htm
l
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/index.pdf
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/linkmap.h
tml
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/linkmap.p
df
[java] AL
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/locationm
ap.xml
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/piglatin.
html
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/piglatin.
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/quickstar
t.html
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/quickstar
t.pdf
[java] AL
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/test1.htm
l
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/tutorial.
html
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/tutorial.
[java] !?????
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/udf.html
[java] B
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/udf.pdf
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/allcl
asses-frame.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/allcl
asses-noframe.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/const
ant-values.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/depre
cated-list.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/help-
doc.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/index
-all.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/index
.html
[java] GEN
/home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/api/overv
iew-frame.html
[jav
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Nigel Daley 2009-03-18, 00:49
These mailing lists don't allow attachments.
On Mar 17, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
> Can't get the attachment in. Mail server must be on strike. Relevant
> portion is inlined below.
>
> Olga
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>>
>> Pig Committers,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>>
>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
>> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
>> greatly improved system performance.
>>
>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
>> files listed as being without a license header. All these
>> files are generated by javacc.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>>
>> Olga
>>
>
> [java]
> [java] *****************************************************
> [java] Summary
> [java] -------
> [java] Notes: 6
> [java] Binaries: 101
> [java] Archives: 10
> [java] Standards: 1712
> [java]
> [java] Apache Licensed: 470
> [java] Generated Documents: 1160
> [java]
> [java] JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
> [java] Generated files do not required license headers
> [java]
> [java] 82 Unknown Licenses
> [java]
> [java] *******************************
> [java]
> [java] Archives (+ indicates readable, $ unreadable):
> [java]
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/pig-1.0.0-
> dev-
> core.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> hadoop17.j
> ar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> hadoop18.j
> ar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> hbase-0.18
> .1-test.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> hbase-0.18
> .1.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> javacc.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> jline-0.9.
> 94.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> jsch-0.1.3
> 3.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> junit-4.1.
> jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/rats.jar
> [java]
> [java] *****************************************************
> [java] Files with AL headers will be marked L
> [java] Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be
> marked B
> [java] Compressed archives will be marked A
> [java] Notices, licenses etc will be marked N
> [java] AL
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/CHANGES.txt
> [java] N
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/LICENSE.txt
> [java] N
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/NOTICE.txt
> [java] N
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/README.txt
> [java] AL
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/build.xml
> [java] A
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/pig-1.0.0-
> dev-
> core.jar
> [java] AL
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/bin/pig
> [java] !?????
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/
> broken-li
> nks.xml
> [java] !?????
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/
> cookbook.
On Mar 17, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
> Can't get the attachment in. Mail server must be on strike. Relevant
> portion is inlined below.
>
> Olga
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>>
>> Pig Committers,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>>
>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
>> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
>> greatly improved system performance.
>>
>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
>> files listed as being without a license header. All these
>> files are generated by javacc.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>>
>> Olga
>>
>
> [java]
> [java] *****************************************************
> [java] Summary
> [java] -------
> [java] Notes: 6
> [java] Binaries: 101
> [java] Archives: 10
> [java] Standards: 1712
> [java]
> [java] Apache Licensed: 470
> [java] Generated Documents: 1160
> [java]
> [java] JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
> [java] Generated files do not required license headers
> [java]
> [java] 82 Unknown Licenses
> [java]
> [java] *******************************
> [java]
> [java] Archives (+ indicates readable, $ unreadable):
> [java]
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/pig-1.0.0-
> dev-
> core.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> hadoop17.j
> ar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> hadoop18.j
> ar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> hbase-0.18
> .1-test.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> hbase-0.18
> .1.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> javacc.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> jline-0.9.
> 94.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> jsch-0.1.3
> 3.jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> junit-4.1.
> jar
> [java] +
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/rats.jar
> [java]
> [java] *****************************************************
> [java] Files with AL headers will be marked L
> [java] Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be
> marked B
> [java] Compressed archives will be marked A
> [java] Notices, licenses etc will be marked N
> [java] AL
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/CHANGES.txt
> [java] N
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/LICENSE.txt
> [java] N
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/NOTICE.txt
> [java] N
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/README.txt
> [java] AL
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/build.xml
> [java] A
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/pig-1.0.0-
> dev-
> core.jar
> [java] AL
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/bin/pig
> [java] !?????
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/
> broken-li
> nks.xml
> [java] !?????
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/docs/
> cookbook.
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Olga Natkovich 2009-03-18, 01:03
It worked for other releases that I did.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 5:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> These mailing lists don't allow attachments.
>
> On Mar 17, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
>
> > Can't get the attachment in. Mail server must be on strike. Relevant
> > portion is inlined below.
> >
> > Olga
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >>
> >> Pig Committers,
> >>
> >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> >>
> >> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> >> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
> >> greatly improved system performance.
> >>
> >> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
> >> files listed as being without a license header. All these
> >> files are generated by javacc.
> >>
> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>
> >> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> >> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
> >>
> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> >>
> >> Olga
> >>
> >
> > [java]
> > [java] *****************************************************
> > [java] Summary
> > [java] -------
> > [java] Notes: 6
> > [java] Binaries: 101
> > [java] Archives: 10
> > [java] Standards: 1712
> > [java]
> > [java] Apache Licensed: 470
> > [java] Generated Documents: 1160
> > [java]
> > [java] JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
> > [java] Generated files do not required license headers
> > [java]
> > [java] 82 Unknown Licenses
> > [java]
> > [java] *******************************
> > [java]
> > [java] Archives (+ indicates readable, $ unreadable):
> > [java]
> > [java] +
> >
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/pig-1.0.0-
> > dev-
> > core.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > hadoop17.j
> > ar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > hadoop18.j
> > ar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > hbase-0.18
> > .1-test.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > hbase-0.18
> > .1.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > javacc.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > jline-0.9.
> > 94.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > jsch-0.1.3
> > 3.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > junit-4.1.
> > jar
> > [java] +
> >
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/rats.jar
> > [java]
> > [java] *****************************************************
> > [java] Files with AL headers will be marked L
> > [java] Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be
> > marked B
> > [java] Compressed archives will be marked A
> > [java] Notices, licenses etc will be marked N
> > [java] AL
> >
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/CHANGES.txt
> > [java] N
> >
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/LICENSE.txt
> > [java] N
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/NOTICE.txt
> > [java] N
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/README.txt
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 5:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> These mailing lists don't allow attachments.
>
> On Mar 17, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
>
> > Can't get the attachment in. Mail server must be on strike. Relevant
> > portion is inlined below.
> >
> > Olga
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >>
> >> Pig Committers,
> >>
> >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> >>
> >> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> >> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and
> >> greatly improved system performance.
> >>
> >> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java
> >> files listed as being without a license header. All these
> >> files are generated by javacc.
> >>
> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>
> >> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> >> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
> >>
> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> >>
> >> Olga
> >>
> >
> > [java]
> > [java] *****************************************************
> > [java] Summary
> > [java] -------
> > [java] Notes: 6
> > [java] Binaries: 101
> > [java] Archives: 10
> > [java] Standards: 1712
> > [java]
> > [java] Apache Licensed: 470
> > [java] Generated Documents: 1160
> > [java]
> > [java] JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
> > [java] Generated files do not required license headers
> > [java]
> > [java] 82 Unknown Licenses
> > [java]
> > [java] *******************************
> > [java]
> > [java] Archives (+ indicates readable, $ unreadable):
> > [java]
> > [java] +
> >
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/pig-1.0.0-
> > dev-
> > core.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > hadoop17.j
> > ar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > hadoop18.j
> > ar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > hbase-0.18
> > .1-test.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > hbase-0.18
> > .1.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > javacc.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > jline-0.9.
> > 94.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > jsch-0.1.3
> > 3.jar
> > [java] +
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/
> > junit-4.1.
> > jar
> > [java] +
> >
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/lib/rats.jar
> > [java]
> > [java] *****************************************************
> > [java] Files with AL headers will be marked L
> > [java] Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be
> > marked B
> > [java] Compressed archives will be marked A
> > [java] Notices, licenses etc will be marked N
> > [java] AL
> >
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/CHANGES.txt
> > [java] N
> >
> /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/LICENSE.txt
> > [java] N
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/NOTICE.txt
> > [java] N
> > /home/olgan/src/pig-apache/branch-1.0/build/pig-1.0.0-dev/README.txt
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Alan Gates 2009-03-20, 17:55
README.txt still has the incubator text in it. This needs to be
removed. I'll roll a new package and call a new vote.
Alan.
On Mar 17, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
removed. I'll roll a new package and call a new vote.
Alan.
On Mar 17, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Santhosh Srinivasan 2009-03-20, 18:54
-1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
there. I would prefer 0.2.0
1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will require
a little bit more work.
2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
Santhosh
-----Original Message-----
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Pig Committers,
I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down. It
also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.
The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.
Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
Please download, test, and try it out:
http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
Olga
there. I would prefer 0.2.0
1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will require
a little bit more work.
2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
Santhosh
-----Original Message-----
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Pig Committers,
I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down. It
also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.
The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.
Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
Please download, test, and try it out:
http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
Olga
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Nigel Daley 2009-03-20, 20:40
Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then?
Nige
On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> require
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
>
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then?
Nige
On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> require
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
>
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Santhosh Srinivasan 2009-03-20, 20:51
Nigel,
It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
email that was sent out back then.
Thanks,
Santhosh
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then?
Nige
On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> require
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
>
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
email that was sent out back then.
Thanks,
Santhosh
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then?
Nige
On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> require
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
>
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Nigel Daley 2009-03-21, 22:32
Not every decision is done by calling for a formal vote. No one -1'd
Olga's proposal.
nige.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> Nigel,
>
> It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
> email that was sent out back then.
>
> Thanks,
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
> weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then?
>
> Nige
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
>> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>>
>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
>> require
>> a little bit more work.
>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
>> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store
>> interfaces
>>
>> Santhosh
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>>
>> Pig Committers,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>>
>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
>> It
>> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
>> performance.
>>
>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
>> listed
>> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
>> javacc.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>>
>> Olga
>
>
> From: "Olga Natkovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: March 6, 2009 5:28:36 PM PST
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Next pig release
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Pig Developers and Committers,
>
> Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
> propose that it is time for the next release.
>
> I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major
> rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
> interfaces.
>
> Olga
>
>
Olga's proposal.
nige.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> Nigel,
>
> It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
> email that was sent out back then.
>
> Thanks,
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
> weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then?
>
> Nige
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
>> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>>
>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
>> require
>> a little bit more work.
>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
>> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store
>> interfaces
>>
>> Santhosh
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>>
>> Pig Committers,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>>
>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
>> It
>> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
>> performance.
>>
>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
>> listed
>> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
>> javacc.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>>
>> Olga
>
>
> From: "Olga Natkovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: March 6, 2009 5:28:36 PM PST
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Next pig release
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Pig Developers and Committers,
>
> Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
> propose that it is time for the next release.
>
> I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major
> rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
> interfaces.
>
> Olga
>
>
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Santhosh Srinivasan 2009-03-22, 23:04
I am doing it now.
Santhosh
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Not every decision is done by calling for a formal vote. No one -1'd
Olga's proposal.
nige.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> Nigel,
>
> It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
> email that was sent out back then.
>
> Thanks,
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
> weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then?
>
> Nige
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
>> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>>
>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
>> require
>> a little bit more work.
>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
>> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store
>> interfaces
>>
>> Santhosh
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>>
>> Pig Committers,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>>
>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
>> It
>> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
>> performance.
>>
>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
>> listed
>> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
>> javacc.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>>
>> Olga
>
>
> From: "Olga Natkovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: March 6, 2009 5:28:36 PM PST
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Next pig release
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Pig Developers and Committers,
>
> Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
> propose that it is time for the next release.
>
> I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major
> rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
> interfaces.
>
> Olga
>
>
Santhosh
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Not every decision is done by calling for a formal vote. No one -1'd
Olga's proposal.
nige.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> Nigel,
>
> It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
> email that was sent out back then.
>
> Thanks,
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
> weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then?
>
> Nige
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
>> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>>
>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
>> require
>> a little bit more work.
>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
>> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store
>> interfaces
>>
>> Santhosh
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>>
>> Pig Committers,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>>
>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
>> It
>> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
>> performance.
>>
>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
>> listed
>> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
>> javacc.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>>
>> Olga
>
>
> From: "Olga Natkovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: March 6, 2009 5:28:36 PM PST
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Next pig release
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Pig Developers and Committers,
>
> Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
> propose that it is time for the next release.
>
> I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major
> rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
> interfaces.
>
> Olga
>
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Alan Gates 2009-03-23, 20:26
To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate release
number, I propose that we release the same code under the name 0.2.0.
Alan.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> require
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
>
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
number, I propose that we release the same code under the name 0.2.0.
Alan.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> require
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
>
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Nigel Daley 2009-03-23, 20:30
+1.
On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate
> release number, I propose that we release the same code under the
> name 0.2.0.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
>> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>>
>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
>> require
>> a little bit more work.
>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
>> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store
>> interfaces
>>
>> Santhosh
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>>
>> Pig Committers,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>>
>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser
>> down. It
>> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
>> performance.
>>
>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
>> listed
>> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
>> javacc.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>>
>> Olga
>
On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate
> release number, I propose that we release the same code under the
> name 0.2.0.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
>> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>>
>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
>> require
>> a little bit more work.
>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
>> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store
>> interfaces
>>
>> Santhosh
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>>
>> Pig Committers,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>>
>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser
>> down. It
>> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
>> performance.
>>
>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
>> listed
>> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
>> javacc.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>>
>> Olga
>
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Olga Natkovich 2009-03-23, 20:34
"Not quite stable" does not seem quantifiable. My understanding is that
more common criteria is backward compatibility as it has more serious
impact to the users and is easier to quantify.
Are we sure that changes to any of the components you mention as "in
progress" will have to break backward compatibility? (Addition of new
APIs does not have to be.)
Finally, I agree with Nigel. This -1 vote is 2 weeks after the
discussions is called and seems a little late to me as well especially
given the fact that we put an effort into building the release.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santhosh Srinivasan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 4:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> I am doing it now.
>
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Not every decision is done by calling for a formal vote. No
> one -1'd Olga's proposal.
>
> nige.
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
>
> > Nigel,
> >
> > It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
> > email that was sent out back then.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Santhosh
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >
> > Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
> > weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then?
> >
> > Nige
> >
> > On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable
> but not quite
> >> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
> >>
> >> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> >> require a little bit more work.
> >> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt 3.
> >> There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
> >>
> >> Santhosh
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >>
> >> Pig Committers,
> >>
> >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> >>
> >> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down.
> >> It
> >> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> >> performance.
> >>
> >> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
> >> listed as being without a license header. All these files are
> >> generated by javacc.
> >>
> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>
> >> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> >> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
> >>
> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> >>
> >> Olga
> >
> >
> > From: "Olga Natkovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: March 6, 2009 5:28:36 PM PST
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Next pig release
> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > Pig Developers and Committers,
> >
> > Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
> > propose that it is time for the next release.
> >
> > I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this
> is a major
> > rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
> > interfaces.
> >
> > Olga
> >
> >
>
>
more common criteria is backward compatibility as it has more serious
impact to the users and is easier to quantify.
Are we sure that changes to any of the components you mention as "in
progress" will have to break backward compatibility? (Addition of new
APIs does not have to be.)
Finally, I agree with Nigel. This -1 vote is 2 weeks after the
discussions is called and seems a little late to me as well especially
given the fact that we put an effort into building the release.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santhosh Srinivasan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 4:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> I am doing it now.
>
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Not every decision is done by calling for a formal vote. No
> one -1'd Olga's proposal.
>
> nige.
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
>
> > Nigel,
> >
> > It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
> > email that was sent out back then.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Santhosh
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >
> > Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
> > weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then?
> >
> > Nige
> >
> > On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable
> but not quite
> >> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
> >>
> >> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> >> require a little bit more work.
> >> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt 3.
> >> There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
> >>
> >> Santhosh
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >>
> >> Pig Committers,
> >>
> >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> >>
> >> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down.
> >> It
> >> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> >> performance.
> >>
> >> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
> >> listed as being without a license header. All these files are
> >> generated by javacc.
> >>
> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>
> >> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> >> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
> >>
> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> >>
> >> Olga
> >
> >
> > From: "Olga Natkovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: March 6, 2009 5:28:36 PM PST
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Next pig release
> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > Pig Developers and Committers,
> >
> > Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
> > propose that it is time for the next release.
> >
> > I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this
> is a major
> > rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
> > interfaces.
> >
> > Olga
> >
> >
>
>
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Olga Natkovich 2009-03-23, 20:35
I would like to understand what it will take to release 1.0.0 before I
cast my vote.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> +1.
>
> On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> > To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an
> appropriate release
> > number, I propose that we release the same code under the
> name 0.2.0.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable
> but not quite
> >> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
> >>
> >> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> >> require a little bit more work.
> >> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt 3.
> >> There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
> >>
> >> Santhosh
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >>
> >> Pig Committers,
> >>
> >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> >>
> >> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down.
> >> It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly
> improved system
> >> performance.
> >>
> >> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
> >> listed as being without a license header. All these files are
> >> generated by javacc.
> >>
> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>
> >> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> >> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
> >>
> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> >>
> >> Olga
> >
>
>
cast my vote.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> +1.
>
> On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> > To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an
> appropriate release
> > number, I propose that we release the same code under the
> name 0.2.0.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable
> but not quite
> >> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
> >>
> >> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> >> require a little bit more work.
> >> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt 3.
> >> There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
> >>
> >> Santhosh
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >>
> >> Pig Committers,
> >>
> >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> >>
> >> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down.
> >> It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly
> improved system
> >> performance.
> >>
> >> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
> >> listed as being without a license header. All these files are
> >> generated by javacc.
> >>
> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>
> >> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> >> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
> >>
> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> >>
> >> Olga
> >
>
>
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Pradeep Kamath 2009-03-23, 20:42
+1
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Gates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate release
number, I propose that we release the same code under the name 0.2.0.
Alan.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> require
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
>
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Gates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate release
number, I propose that we release the same code under the name 0.2.0.
Alan.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> require
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
>
> Santhosh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Nigel Daley 2009-03-23, 20:52
BTW, at this point I'm more concerned that we get a release out than
what it is called. I do think Pig is stable enough for 1.0 but I'm
not willing to let version numbering get in the way of getting a
release out. More frequent releases is better for the community.
Nige
On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> +1.
>
> On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
>> To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate
>> release number, I propose that we release the same code under the
>> name 0.2.0.
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
>>
>>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not
>>> quite
>>> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>>>
>>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
>>> require
>>> a little bit more work.
>>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
>>> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store
>>> interfaces
>>>
>>> Santhosh
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>>>
>>> Pig Committers,
>>>
>>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>>>
>>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser
>>> down. It
>>> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
>>> performance.
>>>
>>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
>>> listed
>>> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
>>> javacc.
>>>
>>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>>
>>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
>>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>>>
>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>>>
>>> Olga
>>
>
what it is called. I do think Pig is stable enough for 1.0 but I'm
not willing to let version numbering get in the way of getting a
release out. More frequent releases is better for the community.
Nige
On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> +1.
>
> On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
>> To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate
>> release number, I propose that we release the same code under the
>> name 0.2.0.
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
>>
>>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not
>>> quite
>>> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>>>
>>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
>>> require
>>> a little bit more work.
>>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
>>> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store
>>> interfaces
>>>
>>> Santhosh
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>>>
>>> Pig Committers,
>>>
>>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>>>
>>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser
>>> down. It
>>> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
>>> performance.
>>>
>>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
>>> listed
>>> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
>>> javacc.
>>>
>>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>>
>>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
>>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>>>
>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>>>
>>> Olga
>>
>
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)Olga Natkovich 2009-03-23, 20:57
+1 for the same reason.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> BTW, at this point I'm more concerned that we get a release
> out than what it is called. I do think Pig is stable enough
> for 1.0 but I'm not willing to let version numbering get in
> the way of getting a release out. More frequent releases is
> better for the community.
>
> Nige
>
> On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>
> > +1.
> >
> > On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> >
> >> To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an
> appropriate release
> >> number, I propose that we release the same code under the
> name 0.2.0.
> >>
> >> Alan.
> >>
> >> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> >>
> >>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not
> >>> quite there. I would prefer 0.2.0
> >>>
> >>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> >>> require a little bit more work.
> >>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using
> grunt 3.
> >>> There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store
> interfaces
> >>>
> >>> Santhosh
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >>>
> >>> Pig Committers,
> >>>
> >>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> >>>
> >>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down.
> >>> It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly
> improved system
> >>> performance.
> >>>
> >>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
> >>> listed as being without a license header. All these files are
> >>> generated by javacc.
> >>>
> >>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>>
> >>> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> >>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
> >>>
> >>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> >>>
> >>> Olga
> >>
> >
>
>
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> BTW, at this point I'm more concerned that we get a release
> out than what it is called. I do think Pig is stable enough
> for 1.0 but I'm not willing to let version numbering get in
> the way of getting a release out. More frequent releases is
> better for the community.
>
> Nige
>
> On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>
> > +1.
> >
> > On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> >
> >> To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an
> appropriate release
> >> number, I propose that we release the same code under the
> name 0.2.0.
> >>
> >> Alan.
> >>
> >> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> >>
> >>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not
> >>> quite there. I would prefer 0.2.0
> >>>
> >>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> >>> require a little bit more work.
> >>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using
> grunt 3.
> >>> There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store
> interfaces
> >>>
> >>> Santhosh
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >>>
> >>> Pig Committers,
> >>>
> >>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> >>>
> >>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the
> parser down.
> >>> It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly
> improved system
> >>> performance.
> >>>
> >>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
> >>> listed as being without a license header. All these files are
> >>> generated by javacc.
> >>>
> >>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>>
> >>> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> >>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
> >>>
> >>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> >>>
> >>> Olga
> >>
> >
>
>
