Hi,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
maintenance release of Pig 0.9.

The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build directory.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0

Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Jan 18th.

Thanks,
Daniel

+1.

I checked the keys and signature of .rpm, .deb, and source release.  I ran smoke tests in both local and cluster mode on the source release.

One issue that we should clear up but that I don't believe blocks the tests is that there are a bunch (~100) 0 length .java files.  These are files that were removed from the code base but ended up getting reset to zero length instead of svn rm'd (they're gone in trunk, which makes me thinks this resulted from a merge).  I don't think we need to reroll over this.  I'll post a patch for this in case there are future rc's or a 0.9.3.  

Alan.

On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
> maintenance release of Pig 0.9.
>
> The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build directory.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Jan 18th.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel

Hi, I'm seeing an issue on ubuntu, perhaps I'm doing something wrong?
(I cleared my jar caches, no help)

I'm able to run this fine with 0.9.1, however using this release
candidate I see the following error:

ant -Dtestcase=TestBuiltin clean test

    [junit] Running org.apache.pig.test.TestBuiltin
    [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec
    [junit] Test org.apache.pig.test.TestBuiltin FAILED

the interesting bit of the log is: (see attached for full log)

12/01/17 11:55:15 WARN datanode.DataNode: Invalid directory in
dfs.data.dir: Incorrect permission for build/test/data/dfs/data/data1,
expected: rwxr-xr-x, while actual: rwxrwxr-x
12/01/17 11:55:15 WARN datanode.DataNode: Invalid directory in
dfs.data.dir: Incorrect permission for build/test/data/dfs/data/data2,
expected: rwxr-xr-x, while actual: rwxrwxr-x
12/01/17 11:55:15 ERROR datanode.DataNode: All directories in
dfs.data.dir are invalid.

$uname -a
Linux ubuntu 3.0.0-14-generic-pae #23-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 21 22:07:10
UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_26"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode)

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1.
>
> I checked the keys and signature of .rpm, .deb, and source release.  I ran smoke tests in both local and cluster mode on the source release.
>
> One issue that we should clear up but that I don't believe blocks the tests is that there are a bunch (~100) 0 length .java files.  These are files that were removed from the code base but ended up getting reset to zero length instead of svn rm'd (they're gone in trunk, which makes me thinks this resulted from a merge).  I don't think we need to reroll over this.  I'll post a patch for this in case there are future rc's or a 0.9.3.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
>> maintenance release of Pig 0.9.
>>
>> The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build directory.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Jan 18th.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>

Hi, Patrick,
Thanks for testing. Please set umask to 0022. It is a known issue and is
included in RELEASE_NOTES.

Daniel

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi, I'm seeing an issue on ubuntu, perhaps I'm doing something wrong?
> (I cleared my jar caches, no help)
>
> I'm able to run this fine with 0.9.1, however using this release
> candidate I see the following error:
>
> ant -Dtestcase=TestBuiltin clean test
>
>    [junit] Running org.apache.pig.test.TestBuiltin
>    [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec
>    [junit] Test org.apache.pig.test.TestBuiltin FAILED
>
> the interesting bit of the log is: (see attached for full log)
>
> 12/01/17 11:55:15 WARN datanode.DataNode: Invalid directory in
> dfs.data.dir: Incorrect permission for build/test/data/dfs/data/data1,
> expected: rwxr-xr-x, while actual: rwxrwxr-x
> 12/01/17 11:55:15 WARN datanode.DataNode: Invalid directory in
> dfs.data.dir: Incorrect permission for build/test/data/dfs/data/data2,
> expected: rwxr-xr-x, while actual: rwxrwxr-x
> 12/01/17 11:55:15 ERROR datanode.DataNode: All directories in
> dfs.data.dir are invalid.
>
> $uname -a
> Linux ubuntu 3.0.0-14-generic-pae #23-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 21 22:07:10
> UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> $ java -version
> java version "1.6.0_26"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1.
> >
> > I checked the keys and signature of .rpm, .deb, and source release.  I
> ran smoke tests in both local and cluster mode on the source release.
> >
> > One issue that we should clear up but that I don't believe blocks the
> tests is that there are a bunch (~100) 0 length .java files.  These are
> files that were removed from the code base but ended up getting reset to
> zero length instead of svn rm'd (they're gone in trunk, which makes me
> thinks this resulted from a merge).  I don't think we need to reroll over
> this.  I'll post a patch for this in case there are future rc's or a 0.9.3.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
> >> maintenance release of Pig 0.9.
> >>
> >> The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build
> directory.
> >>
> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>
> >> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0
> >>
> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Wednesday EOD, Jan 18th.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Daniel
> >
>

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Patrick,
> Thanks for testing. Please set umask to 0022. It is a known issue and is
> included in RELEASE_NOTES.

Shoot, sorry about that. I looked at the readme and skipped the
relnotes. After applying the umask I was able to run the test just
fine. Thanks!

Patrick

Since we find an issue in hadoop 23 test (PIG-2477), I will roll another
candidate.

Thanks,
Daniel

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi, Patrick,
> > Thanks for testing. Please set umask to 0022. It is a known issue and is
> > included in RELEASE_NOTES.
>
> Shoot, sorry about that. I looked at the readme and skipped the
> relnotes. After applying the umask I was able to run the test just
> fine. Thanks!
>
> Patrick
>

Hi,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
maintenance release of Pig 0.9.

The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build directory.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.

Please download, test, and try it out:
<http://people.apache.org/%7Edaijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0>
http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-1/

Should we release this? Vote closes on this Friday EOD, Jan 20th.

Thanks,
Daniel

For your information, I took a shortcut last night to refresh the candidate
1 to include 2 hadoop 23 fix (PIG-2347-4, PIG-2480). If you download the
candidate yesterday, you may need to redownload the candidate.

Thanks,
Daniel

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
> maintenance release of Pig 0.9.
>
> The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build directory.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Edaijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0>
> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on this Friday EOD, Jan 20th.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel

+1.

Checked the rat report, signatures and md5s on all packages.  I installed the tar/src release and ran smoke tests in local and cluster mode.  I also build the packages and ran the commit unit tests.

Alan.

On Jan 17, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
> maintenance release of Pig 0.9.
>
> The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build directory.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Edaijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0>
> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on this Friday EOD, Jan 20th.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel

+1
Checked the md5 checksums, keys of all 3 packages. Ran some simple
queries using the rpm package on a secure and unsecure cluster. Checked
the -version command.

-Thejas

On 1/18/12 11:21 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> For your information, I took a shortcut last night to refresh the candidate
> 1 to include 2 hadoop 23 fix (PIG-2347-4, PIG-2480). If you download the
> candidate yesterday, you may need to redownload the candidate.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Dai<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
>> maintenance release of Pig 0.9.
>>
>> The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build directory.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Edaijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0>
>> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-1/
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on this Friday EOD, Jan 20th.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>

With 4 binding +1s from Alan Gates, Thejas Nair, Pradeep Kamath, Daniel
Dai,
and no -1s, the vote passes!

I will start the releasing process.

Thanks

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Thejas Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
> Checked the md5 checksums, keys of all 3 packages. Ran some simple queries
> using the rpm package on a secure and unsecure cluster. Checked the
> -version command.
>
> -Thejas
>
>
> On 1/18/12 11:21 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
>> For your information, I took a shortcut last night to refresh the
>> candidate
>> 1 to include 2 hadoop 23 fix (PIG-2347-4, PIG-2480). If you download the
>> candidate yesterday, you may need to redownload the candidate.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Dai<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.2. This is the second
>>> maintenance release of Pig 0.9.
>>>
>>> The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build directory.
>>>
>>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup>
>>> .
>>>
>>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>> <http://people.apache.org/%**7Edaijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0<http://people.apache.org/%7Edaijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-0>
>>> >
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~**daijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edaijy/pig-0.9.2-candidate-1/>
>>>
>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on this Friday EOD, Jan 20th.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>
>>
>