Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop >> mail # general >> Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0


+
Arun C Murthy 2011-05-02, 20:07
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0
On 05/02/2011 01:07 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> # Roy clearly clarified the way forward: http://s.apache.org/tD4 (which
> Owen has since incorporated by breaking into individual patches).

Roy suggested a three ways forward and possible outcomes:

Roy Fielding wrote:
>  a) break the changes down into a sequence of patches, create jira
>     issues for each one (or append to the existing issue), and then
>     provide the group with a list of the issue links so that people
>     can quickly +1 each one.  When it seems worthwhile to you, create
>     a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn and commit
>     each patch to it until the branch is identical to (or, in your own
>     opinion, better than) the source code that you have tested locally.
>     Then RM a tarball and start a release vote.  Since all of this is
>     being done in jira and svn, others can help you do all but the
>     first part (breaking down the big patch).
>
> or
>
>  b) create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn
>     and replay the internal Y! commits on that branch until the branch
>     source code is identical to what you have tested locally.  Then
>     RM a tarball based on that branch and start a release vote.
>     Since the history is now in svn, others could do the RM bit if
>     you don't have time.
>
> or
>
>  c) create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn
>     and apply one big ugly patch to it.  Then RM a tarball based
>     on that branch and ask for a release vote.
>
> You will note that none of the above requires a discussion on this
> list prior to the release vote, though (a) would likely result in
> more +1s than (b), and (b) would likely receive more +1s than (c).
> Regardless, the release vote is a lazy majority decision.
>
>  [ ... ]
>
> When the release vote happens, encourage folks to test and +1
> the release.  If it passes, woohoo!  If not, then listen to the
> reasons given by the other PMC members and see if you can make
> enough changes to the release to get those extra +1s.

I believe that Owen chose (b).  We're now at the release vote and I am a
PMC member giving reasons for my vote.

Also note that, on the common-dev thread, Eli & Tom have both noted a
number of inconsistencies between this set of patches and trunk, 0.22
and even prior 0.20 branches and releases.  In addition to the lack of
community involvement in patch selection, these issues concern me.

I cannot in good conscience vote for this release as a community product.

Doug
+
Arun C Murthy 2011-05-02, 21:05
+
Doug Cutting 2011-05-02, 21:21
+
Arun C Murthy 2011-05-02, 21:33
+
Doug Cutting 2011-05-02, 21:48
+
Ian Holsman 2011-05-02, 21:49
+
Arun C Murthy 2011-05-02, 22:19
+
Doug Cutting 2011-05-02, 21:55
+
Doug Cutting 2011-05-04, 00:16
+
Arun C Murthy 2011-05-04, 01:01
+
Doug Cutting 2011-05-04, 23:46
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-05-02, 22:05
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-05-02, 22:14
+
Arun C Murthy 2011-05-02, 22:15
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-02, 22:19
+
Doug Cutting 2011-05-02, 22:25
+
Jake Cornelius 2011-05-02, 22:31
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2011-05-03, 08:39
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-03, 17:02
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-05-03, 23:58
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2011-05-08, 05:41
+
Owen OMalley 2011-05-11, 17:36
+
Ian Holsman 2011-05-11, 17:38
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2011-05-11, 18:40
+
Owen OMalley 2011-05-11, 22:10
+
Raghu Angadi 2011-05-11, 19:09
+
Owen OMalley 2011-05-04, 17:31
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-04, 19:17
+
Eric Baldeschwieler 2011-05-04, 20:26
+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-05-04, 20:17
+
Owen OMalley 2011-05-04, 23:19
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-04, 22:03
+
Suresh Srinivas 2011-05-04, 22:06
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-04, 22:24
+
Jakob Homan 2011-05-04, 22:29
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-04, 22:36
+
Tsz Wo \ 2011-05-04, 23:09
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-04, 23:11
+
Arun C Murthy 2011-05-04, 23:11
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-05-04, 23:44
+
Arun C Murthy 2011-05-04, 23:55
+
Eric Baldeschwieler 2011-05-05, 00:05
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-05, 00:22
+
Mahadev Konar 2011-05-05, 00:30
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-05, 00:39
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2011-05-05, 00:43
+
Eric Baldeschwieler 2011-05-05, 01:18
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-05, 01:24
+
Roy T. Fielding 2011-05-05, 01:56
+
Dhruba Borthakur 2011-05-05, 02:20
+
Nigel Daley 2011-05-05, 04:17
+
Jeff Hammerbacher 2011-05-05, 04:54
+
Eric Sammer 2011-05-05, 05:47
+
Matei Zaharia 2011-05-05, 06:21
+
Jane Chen 2011-05-05, 06:49
+
Lars Francke 2011-05-06, 10:07
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-05-04, 22:30
+
Suresh Srinivas 2011-05-04, 22:41
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-04, 22:51
+
Suresh Srinivas 2011-05-05, 19:02
+
Jakob Homan 2011-05-05, 20:56
+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-05-07, 00:49
+
Todd Papaioannou 2011-05-07, 01:43
+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-05-07, 02:31
+
Milind Bhandarkar 2011-05-07, 06:18
+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-05-07, 19:06
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2011-05-04, 23:32
+
Arun C Murthy 2011-05-04, 22:05
+
Mahadev Konar 2011-05-04, 23:29
+
Doug Cutting 2011-05-04, 22:17
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-05-04, 22:23
+
Devaraj Das 2011-05-05, 01:10
+
Milind Bhandarkar 2011-05-05, 01:30
+
Chris Douglas 2011-05-05, 01:12
+
Eli Collins 2011-05-05, 01:19
+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2011-05-05, 01:24
+
Roy T. Fielding 2011-05-05, 02:22
+
Ian Holsman 2011-05-05, 03:34
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-05-05, 16:18
+
Steve Loughran 2011-05-06, 11:52
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-05-06, 18:30
+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2011-05-05, 06:52
+
Roy T. Fielding 2011-05-05, 21:10
+
Sanjay Radia 2011-05-05, 06:32
+
Stack 2011-05-05, 18:33
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-05-05, 02:12
+
Tsz Wo \ 2011-05-06, 00:42