Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # user >> Slow scanning for PrefixFilter on EncodedBlocks


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Slow scanning for PrefixFilter on EncodedBlocks
Is this related to HBASE-6757 ?
I use a filter list with
  - prefix filter
  - filter list of column filters

/zahoor

On Monday, October 15, 2012, J Mohamed Zahoor wrote:

> Hi
>
> My scanner performance is very slow when using a Prefix filter on a
> **Encoded Column** ( encoded using FAST_DIFF on both memory and disk).
> I am using 94.1 hbase.
>
> jstack shows that much time is spent on seeking the row.
> Even if i give a exact row key match in the prefix filter it takes about
> two minutes to return a single row.
> Running this multiple times also seems to be redirecting things to disk
> (loadBlock).
>
>
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileReaderV2$EncodedScannerV2.loadBlockAndSeekToKey(HFileReaderV2.java:1027)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileReaderV2$AbstractScannerV2.seekTo(HFileReaderV2.java:461)
>  at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileReaderV2$AbstractScannerV2.reseekTo(HFileReaderV2.java:493)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.reseekAtOrAfter(StoreFileScanner.java:242)
>  at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.reseek(StoreFileScanner.java:167)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.NonLazyKeyValueScanner.doRealSeek(NonLazyKeyValueScanner.java:54)
>  at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreScanner.reseek(StoreScanner.java:521)
> - locked <0x000000059584fab8> (a
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreScanner)
>  at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreScanner.next(StoreScanner.java:402)
> - locked <0x000000059584fab8> (a
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreScanner)
>  at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.nextRow(HRegion.java:3507)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.nextInternal(HRegion.java:3455)
>  at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.next(HRegion.java:3406)
> - locked <0x000000059589bb30> (a
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl)
>  at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.next(HRegion.java:3423)
>
> If is set the start and end row as same row in scan ... it come in very
> quick.
>
> Saw this link
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/9f0JH1Kz24U1&subj=Re+HBase+0+94+2+SNAPSHOT+Scanning+Bug
> But it looks like things are fine in 94.1.
>
> Any pointers on why this is slow?
>
>
> Note: the row has not many columns(5 and less than a kb) and lots of
> versions (1500+)
>
> ./zahoor
>
>
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB