Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.7 - Switch for Accumulo 1.6.0


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.7 - Switch for Accumulo 1.6.0
I would assume all our votes are "community welcome to vote, only
committers binding."

Billie
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:52 AM, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Who is voting - the accumulo community, the PMC members, or some other
> subset of people?
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:51 PM, David Lyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -1 Prefer to stay on java 1.6 until pulled by features or eol.
> >
> > -D...
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:53 PM, German Gutierrez
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Everyone,
> > >
> > > I vote for in favor.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > German A. Gutierrez
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > All-
> > > >
> > > > Please explicitly vote in favor or against changing the java
> > > > dependency to >=1.7.
> > > >
> > > > Parsing vague "may cause..." or "might be..." concerns throughout the
> > > > text of the thread is tedious, and does not help me know what the
> > > > consensus of the group is, so we can move forward. If there's a
> > > > specific issue that is informing your vote, that's great, feel free
> to
> > > > state it, but I don't want this issue to drag out for the duration of
> > > > the the Accumulo 1.6.0 development cycle because people are reluctant
> > > > to come to a concrete opinion.
> > > >
> > > > If it fails a vote, we'll revisit for Accumulo 1.7.0.
> > > >
> > > > I'm personally in favor of the change (+1), but it's not a big deal
> to
> > > > me. I just want a concrete resolution.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > I have also heard mulling about issues with the way Kerberos
> > > > authentication
> > > > > behaves with JDK1.7 for hadoop. This may also have implications on
> > the
> > > > > Accumulo implementation as well.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Sean Busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Ben Popp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >> <snip>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > CDH4 claims JDK 1.6 and 1.7 support:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Requirements-and-Supported-Versions/cdhrsv_topic_3.html
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > <snip>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> CDH4 comes with some additional caveats about 1.7:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Release-Notes/cdh4rn_topic_2_2.html?scroll=concept_c1n_bln_tj_unique_1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The biggest one being the disclaimer about 1.7 compiled code.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Sean
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>