-Re: Migrate 0.94 to remote 0.96
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-11-11, 13:44
So, seems that it went well. The only thing is that I don't have snappy on
the new cluster so one table has 0 regions deployed, but expect that, seems
pretty "simple". Thanks again.
2013/11/10 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks Himanshu. I missed this section. So I will "simply" dump all HDFS
> files to huge disks, move them, restore them on the other side and run
> hbase upgrade... It seems to be pretty easy. I will update this thread with
> the result...
> 2013/11/10 Himanshu Vashishtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Did you look at the upgrade section in the book,
>> It does in-place upgrade of a 94 installation to 96.
>> In case your 96 is fresh, you could dump/copy all your 94 data under root
>> dir, and run the upgrade script.
>> No, 96 doesn't convert each table automatically, one need to use the
>> upgrade script.
>> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I have a 0.94 (hadoop 1.0.3) cluster that I want to migrate to a 0.96
>> > (hadoop 2.2.0) cluster. However, there is no network connection between
>> > 2 clusters... What's the best way to do that?
>> > I tried with a single table first. Did an extract from 0.94 to the local
>> > disk using hadoop get of all the files into /hbase/tablename and tried
>> > re-import on the 0.96 side. I was able to see the table name, but not
>> > content. I guess because of namespace and others, it's not doable?
>> > Another option is to export in CVS format, then transfer. the files, and
>> > re-import on the 0.96 side. But I would have liked to keep the regions
>> > splits, etc.
>> > So the only working option I see for now is the CVS. Any other one?
>> > Next, if I'm able to get a network between the 2 clusters, then
>> > should be the best option? Or an I "simply" dist-cp with entire /hbase
>> > folder? I guess this last option is not reall correct since I will have
>> > 0.94 format in the 0.96 cluster. Or will the 0.96 cluster automatically
>> > convert each table with is in the old format?
>> > Thanks,
>> > JM