Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop, mail # general - [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha


+
Arun C Murthy 2012-05-09, 16:58
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-05-09, 17:17
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-05-09, 18:30
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-05-09, 18:33
+
Suresh Srinivas 2012-05-09, 20:45
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-05-10, 01:05
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-05-10, 05:00
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-05-10, 18:23
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-05-10, 18:30
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-05-10, 18:37
+
Eli Collins 2012-05-09, 17:05
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-05-09, 18:28
+
Eli Collins 2012-05-10, 05:10
+
Ahmed Radwan 2012-05-10, 00:13
+
Eli Collins 2012-05-12, 02:19
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-05-13, 05:05
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-05-14, 16:54
+
Uma Maheswara Rao G 2012-05-14, 17:56
+
Tsz Wo Sze 2012-05-14, 18:07
+
Uma Maheswara Rao G 2012-05-14, 18:23
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-05-14, 18:10
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
Tsz Wo Sze 2012-05-14, 19:16
I just have merged HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366.  I also have merged HDFS-3211 since it is an incompatible protocol change (without it, 2.0.0-alphaand 2.0.0 will be incompatible.)

Tsz-Wo

----- Original Message -----
From: Tsz Wo Sze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha

Let me merge HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366.  Thanks.
Tsz-Wo

----- Original Message -----
From: Uma Maheswara Rao G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha

> a) Revert HDFS-3157 and commit HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366 on
> branch-2.0.0-alpha, so these are the only changes since rc0. Roll a
> new rc1 from here.
I have merged HDFS-3157 revert.
Do you mind taking a look at HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366?

Thanks,
Uma
________________________________________
From: Arun C Murthy [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 10:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha

Todd,

Please go ahead and merge changes into branch-2.0.0-alpha and I'll roll RC1.

thanks,
Arun

On May 12, 2012, at 10:05 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:

> Looking at the release tag vs the current state of branch-2, I have
> two concerns from the point of view of HDFS:
>
> 1) We reverted HDFS-3157 in branch-2 because it sends deletions for
> corrupt replicas without properly going through the "corrupt block"
> path. We saw this cause data loss in TestPipelinesFailover. So, I'm
> nervous about putting it in a release, even labeled as alpha.
>
> 2) HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366 changed the wire format for the RPC
> envelope in branch-2, but didn't make it into this rc. So, that would
> mean that future alphas would not be protocol-compatible with this
> alpha. Per a discussion a few weeks ago, I think we all were in
> agreement that, if possible, we'd like all 2.x to be compatible for
> client-server communication, at least (even if we don't support
> cross-version for the intra-cluster protocols)
>
> Do other folks think it's worth rolling an rc1? I would propose either:
> a) Revert HDFS-3157 and commit HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366 on
> branch-2.0.0-alpha, so these are the only changes since rc0. Roll a
> new rc1 from here.
> or:
> b) Discard the current branch-2.0.0-alpha and re-branch from the
> current state of branch-2.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1  I installed the build on a 6 node cluster and kicked the tires,
>> didn't find any blocking issues.
>>
>> Btw in the future better to build from the svn repo so the revision is
>> an svn rev from the release branch. Eg 1336254 instead of 40e90d3c7
>> which is from the git mirror, this way we're consistent across
>> releases.
>>
>> hadoop-2.0.0-alpha $ ./bin/hadoop version
>> Hadoop 2.0.0-alpha
>> Subversion git://devadm900.cc1.ygridcore.net/grid/0/dev/acm/hadoop-trunk/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common
>> -r 40e90d3c7e5d71aedcdc2d9cc55d078e78944c55
>> Compiled by hortonmu on Wed May  9 16:19:55 UTC 2012
>> From source with checksum 3d9a13a31ef3a9ab4b5cba1f982ab888
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I've created a release candidate for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would like to release.
>>>
>>> It is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc0/
>>>
>>> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
>>>
>>> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
>>>
>>> This is a big milestone for the Apache Hadoop community - congratulations and thanks for all the contributions!
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Arun
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Arun C. Murthy
>>> Hortonworks Inc.
>>> http://hortonworks.com/
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera

--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
+
Eli Collins 2012-05-14, 20:32
+
Siddharth Seth 2012-05-14, 21:14
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-05-15, 04:20
+
Kumar Ravi 2012-05-15, 15:51
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-05-15, 17:00
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-05-15, 17:05
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-05-15, 18:10
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-05-15, 18:55
+
Eli Collins 2012-05-15, 18:58
+
Eli Collins 2012-05-15, 19:04
+
Robert Evans 2012-05-09, 18:20
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-05-16, 02:20
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-05-16, 05:30
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-05-16, 06:06
+
Steve Loughran 2012-05-17, 00:52
+
Eli Collins 2012-05-16, 23:11
+
Ahmed Radwan 2012-05-21, 23:59
+
Suresh Srinivas 2012-05-22, 13:49
+
Robert Evans 2012-05-16, 07:04
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-05-16, 22:35
+
sanjay Radia 2012-05-22, 07:14
+
Uma Maheswara Rao G 2012-05-21, 08:34
+
Matt Foley 2012-05-21, 19:23
+
Devaraj Das 2012-05-21, 23:14
+
Siddharth Seth 2012-05-22, 05:45
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-05-21, 20:17
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-05-23, 17:22
+
Matt Foley 2012-05-23, 17:31
+
Thomas Graves 2012-05-17, 15:16
+
Jitendra Pandey 2012-05-18, 02:00
+
Devaraj k 2012-05-21, 06:13
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2012-05-17, 23:01
+
Tsz Wo \ 2012-05-22, 21:13